Watt J W, Fraser M H
Spinal Injuries Unit, Southport District General Hospital, Merseyside.
Anaesthesia. 1994 Apr;49(4):320-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb14184.x.
Some ventilator-dependent patients use uncuffed tracheostomy tubes, resulting in fluctuations in the minute volume of ventilation. Bedside measurement of ventilation is difficult because of the insufflation and exsufflation leaks. This laboratory study of five different ventilators measured the tidal volumes achieved with three insufflation leaks introduced in an increasing order of magnitude and at three levels of compliance. The largest leak reduced the peak inflation pressure from 26 to 14 cmH2O in two pressure-limited ventilators with a 35% loss of the initial tidal volume of 800 ml. The turbine-driven pressure-limited ventilator retained a peak pressure of 20.5 cmH2O and lost only 14% of the volume, whereas the volume ventilators lost 65% of the tidal volume. The loss of volume was 3% for every cmH2O decrease in airway pressure due to a leak, regardless of the ventilator or compliance. Using the Friedman test, the differences between the volume ventilators and the pressure ventilators were significant whilst the three pressure-limited ventilators did not perform significantly differently from each other.
一些依赖呼吸机的患者使用无套囊气管造口管,导致分钟通气量波动。由于吹入和呼出泄漏,床边通气测量很困难。这项针对五种不同呼吸机的实验室研究,测量了在三种顺应性水平下,以递增的量级引入三种吹入泄漏时所达到的潮气量。在两台压力限制型呼吸机中,最大泄漏使峰值充气压力从26厘米水柱降至14厘米水柱,初始800毫升潮气量损失了35%。涡轮驱动压力限制型呼吸机的峰值压力保持在20.5厘米水柱,仅损失了14%的潮气量,而容量型呼吸机则损失了65%的潮气量。由于泄漏导致气道压力每降低1厘米水柱,潮气量损失3%,与呼吸机类型或顺应性无关。使用弗里德曼检验,容量型呼吸机和压力型呼吸机之间的差异显著,而三台压力限制型呼吸机之间的表现没有显著差异。