READER：一个帮助全科医生进行批判性阅读的首字母缩写词。
READER: an acronym to aid critical reading by general practitioners.
作者信息
MacAuley D
机构信息
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Queen's University of Belfast.
出版信息
Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Feb;44(379):83-5.
Abstract
READER represents a sequence of steps in the assessment of general practice literature. An article may be judged on the first four steps: r for relevance, e for education, a for applicability, d for discrimination. The next step, e, involves the evaluation of the article using a scoring system. Finally the reader decides what to do with the article, as illustrated by r for reaction.
摘要
READER代表了评估全科医学文献的一系列步骤。一篇文章可以根据前四个步骤进行评判：r代表相关性（relevance），e代表教育性（education），a代表适用性（applicability），d代表辨别力（discrimination）。下一步，e，涉及使用评分系统对文章进行评估。最后，读者决定如何处理这篇文章，如r代表反应（reaction）所示。
相似文献
1
READER: an acronym to aid critical reading by general practitioners.READER：一个帮助全科医生进行批判性阅读的首字母缩写词。
Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Feb;44(379):83-5.
2
Critical reading using the READER acronym by experienced general practitioners (G.P.s) and by G.P. registrars in southern and Northern Ireland.北爱尔兰和南爱尔兰的经验丰富的全科医生（G.P.s）以及全科医生注册员使用“READER”首字母缩写进行批判性阅读。
Ir J Med Sci. 1997 Jul-Sep;166(3):121-3. doi: 10.1007/BF02943585.
3
[Continuing medical education. Experience of the private practice general physician].[继续医学教育。私人执业全科医生的经验]
Tunis Med. 1999 Jun-Jul;77(6-7):309-10.
4
Motivation of general practitioners attending postgraduate education.全科医生参加研究生教育的动机。
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jun;46(407):353-6.
5
[Continuing medical education offers to general practitioners in the county of Aarhus].[为奥胡斯郡全科医生提供的继续医学教育]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2004 May 17;166(21):2047-50.
6
[Motivation and barriers to the use of facilitator visits in general practice].[全科医疗中使用促进者家访的动机与障碍]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2008 Feb 25;170(9):731-5.
7
[Treatment of asthma--an analysis of clinical judgment among general practitioners].[哮喘的治疗——全科医生临床判断分析]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2005 Nov 3;125(21):2949-52.
8
Choosing general practice as a career - the influences of education and training.选择全科医疗作为职业——教育与培训的影响
Aust Fam Physician. 2009 May;38(5):341-4.
9
Patients' evaluation of quality of care in general practice: what are the cultural and linguistic barriers?患者对全科医疗服务质量的评价：文化和语言障碍有哪些？
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jul;72(1):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.018. Epub 2008 May 15.
10
[The competence of family physicians in caring for dementia patients. A survey of general practitioners in Quebec].[家庭医生照顾痴呆患者的能力。魁北克全科医生调查]
Can Fam Physician. 1996 Aug;42:1496-502.
引用本文的文献
1
Effectiveness of the tailored EBP training program for Filipino physiotherapists: a randomised controlled trial.菲律宾物理治疗师定制循证实践培训方案的效果：一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Apr 13;11:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-14.
2
How to critically appraise an article.如何批判性地评价一篇文章。
Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Feb;6(2):82-91. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep1331. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
3
Randomised controlled trial of the READER method of critical appraisal in general practice.全科医疗中批判性评价的READER方法随机对照试验。
BMJ. 1998 Apr 11;316(7138):1134-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7138.1134.
4
Critical reading using the READER acronym by experienced general practitioners (G.P.s) and by G.P. registrars in southern and Northern Ireland.北爱尔兰和南爱尔兰的经验丰富的全科医生（G.P.s）以及全科医生注册员使用“READER”首字母缩写进行批判性阅读。
Ir J Med Sci. 1997 Jul-Sep;166(3):121-3. doi: 10.1007/BF02943585.
5
A review of the British Journal of Sports Medicine 1991-5.对《英国运动医学杂志》1991年至1995年的回顾。
Br J Sports Med. 1996 Dec;30(4):354-5. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.30.4.354.
6
Outcomes research in clinical practice. Descriptive studies are unhelpful.临床实践中的疗效研究。描述性研究并无帮助。
BMJ. 1994 Aug 6;309(6951):412. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6951.412.
本文引用的文献
1
Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample?医学研究中的统计学与伦理学：III样本量应为多大？
Br Med J. 1980 Nov 15;281(6251):1336-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6251.1336.
2
Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals.医学期刊投稿人统计指南。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 May 7;286(6376):1489-93. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6376.1489.
3
Is the statistical assessment of papers submitted to the "British Medical Journal" effective?对提交给《英国医学杂志》的论文进行的统计评估有效吗？
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 May 7;286(6376):1485-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6376.1485.
4
Manuscript review from a statistician's perspective.
JAMA. 1985 Jun 7;253(21):3145-7.
5
Is the clinical trial evidence about new drugs statistically adequate?关于新药的临床试验证据在统计学上充分吗？
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1985 Feb;19(2):155-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1985.tb02626.x.
6
Towards estimation and confidence intervals.关于估计和置信区间。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Mar 15;292(6522):716. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6522.716.
7
Critical reading.
Fam Pract. 1991 Mar;8(1):1-2. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.1.1.
8
Duplicate publication.重复发表。
BMJ. 1992 Apr 18;304(6833):999-1000. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6833.999.
Zotero 插件