• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在不同言语和噪声水平下,商用助听器的优选真耳插入增益。

Preferred real-ear insertion gain on a commercial hearing aid at different speech and noise levels.

作者信息

Kuk F K, Harper T, Doubek K

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago 60612.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 1994 Mar;5(2):99-109.

PMID:8180434
Abstract

In the present study, we measured preferred real-ear insertion gain (REIG) under different levels of speech and noise to assess whether current automatic gain control (AGC) and automatic signal processing (ASP) hearing aids are operating optimally. Preferred REIG for optimal speech clarity was determined under seven speech and noise conditions. In four conditions, speech (discourse passages) was varied from 55 dB SPL to 85 dB SPL in 10-dB steps at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of +5. In the remaining conditions, speech was fixed at 65 dB SPL while the noise level was varied in 5-dB steps to yield S/Ns from +10 to -5. The results showed that subjects selected less gain as speech or noise levels were increased. In general, less overall gain was selected as speech level was increased, and less overall gain, especially in the low-frequency region, was selected as the S/N ratio became progressively poorer. These results are discussed in relation to how hearing aids with adaptive frequency/gain responses should respond to varying input levels to achieve optimal clarity of speech.

摘要

在本研究中,我们测量了在不同语音和噪声水平下的偏好真耳插入增益(REIG),以评估当前的自动增益控制(AGC)和自动信号处理(ASP)助听器是否处于最佳工作状态。在七种语音和噪声条件下确定了实现最佳语音清晰度的偏好REIG。在四种条件下,语音(语篇段落)在固定信噪比(S/N)为+5的情况下,以10 dB步长从55 dB SPL变化到85 dB SPL。在其余条件下,语音固定在65 dB SPL,同时噪声水平以5 dB步长变化,以产生从+10到-5的信噪比。结果表明,随着语音或噪声水平的增加,受试者选择的增益减少。一般来说,随着语音水平的增加,选择的总增益减少,并且随着信噪比逐渐变差,选择的总增益减少,尤其是在低频区域。结合具有自适应频率/增益响应的助听器应如何响应变化的输入水平以实现最佳语音清晰度对这些结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Preferred real-ear insertion gain on a commercial hearing aid at different speech and noise levels.在不同言语和噪声水平下,商用助听器的优选真耳插入增益。
J Am Acad Audiol. 1994 Mar;5(2):99-109.
2
A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.成人使用通用助听器处方方法的增益比较:对预测响度、频率带宽和言语可懂度的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(7):441-59. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.7.5.
3
Comparison of real-ear insertion gains in Japanese-speaking individuals wearing hearing aids with DSLv5 and NAL-NL2.佩戴采用DSLv5和NAL-NL2标准的助听器的日语使用者的真耳插入增益比较。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Feb;48(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
4
Preferred listening levels for linear and slow-acting compression hearing aids.线性和慢作用压缩式助听器的首选聆听水平。
Ear Hear. 1995 Aug;16(4):407-16. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199508000-00007.
5
Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.针对感音神经性听力损失患者的双通道全动态范围压缩系统评估
Ear Hear. 1992 Oct;13(5):349-70. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199210000-00012.
6
Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.助听器在不同输入水平下对言语可懂度的益处。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Mar;26(3):275-88. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.3.7.
7
Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.感音神经性听力损失患者在使用线性和压缩式助听器的未助听和助听条件下的语音识别性能。
Ear Hear. 2002 Aug;23(4):280-90. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200208000-00003.
8
The Effect of a High Upper Input Limiting Level on Word Recognition in Noise, Sound Quality Preferences, and Subjective Ratings of Real-World Performance.高输入上限水平对噪声环境下单词识别、声音质量偏好及实际性能主观评分的影响
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Jun;26(6):547-62. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.14051.
9
Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.CAM2 与 NAL-NL2 两种助听器验配方法的比较。
Ear Hear. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):83-95. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182650adf.
10
Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids.使用可穿戴数字助听器对不同压缩形式的比较。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Dec;106(6):3603-19. doi: 10.1121/1.428213.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.助听器放大的自我调节:独立评估、配对比较和言语识别。
Am J Audiol. 2022 Jun 2;31(2):305-321. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00164. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
2
Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain.聆听者因素对自我调节助听器增益的变化影响不大。
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519837124. doi: 10.1177/2331216519837124.
3
Self-Adjusted Amplification Parameters Produce Large Between-Subject Variability and Preserve Speech Intelligibility.
自调节放大参数产生较大的个体间变异性并保持言语可懂度。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518798264. doi: 10.1177/2331216518798264.
4
Pilot study to evaluate hearing aid service delivery model and measure benefit using self-report outcome measures using community hearing workers in a developing country.一项试点研究,旨在评估助听器服务提供模式,并利用发展中国家社区听力工作者通过自我报告结局指标来衡量其益处。
ISRN Otolaryngol. 2013 Feb 6;2013:973401. doi: 10.1155/2013/973401. Print 2013.