Lewine J D, Doty R W, Astur R S, Provencal S L
Department of Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York 14642.
J Neurosci. 1994 May;14(5 Pt 1):2515-30. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-05-02515.1994.
A serial probe recognition task was used to examine the interhemispheric exchange of visual data in macaques. Each block of trials began with the memorization of one to six visual target images. The monkeys then had to determine, in tests that followed immediately, whether probe images were or were not members of the learned target set. Previous work with both humans and macaques has shown that the time required for the evaluation of probes generally increases, while response accuracy decreases, as a function of the number of targets, the "memory load". By testing animals with bisected optic chiasm, it was possible to direct visual information to only one hemisphere at a time, simply by occluding the opposite eye. In this fashion, the quality of intrahemispheric evaluations (in which a monocular probe was a match for a target previously viewed through the same eye) was compared with that of interhemispheric evaluations (in which a probe was a match for a target previously designated through the opposite eye). A key question was whether division of the target list between the hemispheres modified the relationships between reaction time, response accuracy, and memory load. Provided that either the anterior commissure or the splenium of the corpus callosum was intact, interhemispheric processing was only subtly less efficient than intrahemispheric processing. The ability to perform interhemispheric evaluations was selectively and completely disrupted if all forebrain commissural fibers were transected. In this latter split-brain condition, the time required for probe evaluations was, as expected, determined solely by the number of target items memorized by the probed hemisphere. Accuracy, however, was always a function of the total memory load, regardless of the distribution of targets between the hemispheres. This implies, first, that accuracy and latency do not reflect identical mnemonic factors, as frequently held, and second, that in mnemonic processing, the two hemispheres draw upon a unified, shared resource, probably allocated by the intact brainstem.
采用序列探针识别任务来检测猕猴视觉数据的半球间交换。每个试验块开始时会记忆一到六个视觉目标图像。然后,猴子必须在紧接着的测试中确定探针图像是否属于所学目标集。先前对人类和猕猴的研究表明,随着目标数量(即“记忆负荷”)的增加,评估探针所需的时间通常会增加,而反应准确性会降低。通过测试视交叉被切断的动物,只需遮挡对侧眼睛,就有可能一次仅将视觉信息导向一个半球。通过这种方式,将半球内评估(单眼探针与先前通过同一只眼睛看到的目标匹配)与半球间评估(探针与先前通过对侧眼睛指定的目标匹配)的质量进行了比较。一个关键问题是目标列表在两个半球之间的划分是否会改变反应时间、反应准确性和记忆负荷之间的关系。只要胼胝体的前连合或压部完好无损,半球间处理仅比半球内处理效率略低。如果所有前脑连合纤维都被切断,进行半球间评估的能力就会被选择性地完全破坏。在这种后一种裂脑情况下,正如预期的那样,探针评估所需的时间仅由被探测半球记忆的目标项目数量决定。然而,准确性始终是总记忆负荷的函数,而与目标在两个半球之间的分布无关。这首先意味着,准确性和潜伏期并不像通常认为的那样反映相同的记忆因素,其次意味着在记忆处理中,两个半球利用的是一个统一的共享资源,可能是由完整的脑干分配的。