Simmons M S, Oleson T D
Department of Orofacial Pain and Occlusion, UCLA School of Dentistry.
Anesth Prog. 1993;40(1):14-9.
A modified double-blind evaluation of naloxone reversibility of dental analgesia produced by auricular electrical stimulation (AES) was examined in 40 subjects assigned randomly to one of four groups: AES followed by saline (AS), AES followed by naloxone (AN), placebo AES followed by saline (PS), and placebo AES followed by naloxone (PN). Dental pain threshold was tested using a hand-held dental pulp tester. A second investigator administered the true or placebo AES using an electrical stimulator. A third investigator injected intravenously saline or naloxone. The subjects and investigators 1 and 3 were blind to all treatment conditions. A repeated measures analysis of variance revealed a significant difference among the four groups. The AES groups exhibited a statistically significant 18% elevation of pain threshold, whereas the two placebo stimulation groups (PS and PN) remained essentially unchanged. The mean pain threshold increased to more than 23% for group AS, but fell to less than 12% for the subjects in group AN, who were given naloxone. These findings indicate a small but significant elevation of pain threshold by AES, an effect partially blocked by naloxone, suggesting an endogenous opioid system as one mechanism for AES analgesia.
对40名随机分配到四组之一的受试者进行了一项改良双盲评估,以研究耳电刺激(AES)产生的牙科镇痛中纳洛酮的可逆性:AES后注射生理盐水(AS)、AES后注射纳洛酮(AN)、安慰剂AES后注射生理盐水(PS)以及安慰剂AES后注射纳洛酮(PN)。使用手持式牙髓测试仪测试牙科疼痛阈值。第二名研究人员使用电刺激器进行真实或安慰剂AES。第三名研究人员静脉注射生理盐水或纳洛酮。受试者以及研究人员1和3对所有治疗条件均不知情。重复测量方差分析显示四组之间存在显著差异。AES组的疼痛阈值在统计学上显著提高了18%,而两个安慰剂刺激组(PS和PN)基本保持不变。AS组的平均疼痛阈值增加到超过23%,但接受纳洛酮的AN组受试者的疼痛阈值降至不到12%。这些发现表明AES可使疼痛阈值有小幅但显著的提高,该效应部分被纳洛酮阻断,提示内源性阿片系统是AES镇痛的一种机制。