Berden H J, Bierens J J, Willems F F, Hendrick J M, Pijls N H, Knape J T
Dutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 May;23(5):1003-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70094-x.
To investigate the ability of laypeople to apply basic CPR techniques after recent training.
Cross-sectional assessment of practical CPR skills.
151 laypeople who were trained twice in the preceding 20 to 24 months.
Practical skills were tested using six primary recorded variables that describe the quality of CPR techniques in a training situation. A total score on the skills of each participant was computed on the basis of a predefined scoring system. Thirty-three percent of the participants were able to perform adequate CPR. The compression:relaxation ratio, the breathing volume, and the breathing interval were points of concern.
Practical skills in basic CPR after a 12-month training interval, though better in this study than in many previous studies, are insufficient in the majority of laypeople. The results of this study could be used to design a better tailored (re)instruction program, with an emphasis on regular, frequent refresher courses.
调查非专业人员在近期接受培训后应用基本心肺复苏术（CPR）技术的能力。
对实际CPR技能进行横断面评估。
151名在之前20至24个月内接受过两次培训的非专业人员。
使用六个主要记录变量对实际技能进行测试，这些变量描述了培训场景中心肺复苏术技术的质量。根据预定义的评分系统计算每个参与者的技能总分。33%的参与者能够进行充分的心肺复苏。按压与放松比例、呼吸量和呼吸间隔是需要关注的要点。
经过12个月的培训间隔后，非专业人员的基本心肺复苏实际技能，尽管在本研究中比许多先前研究要好，但大多数非专业人员的技能仍不足。本研究结果可用于设计一个更具针对性的（再）指导方案，重点是定期、频繁的复习课程。
