Kuhnigk H, Sefrin P, Paulus T
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Würzburg, Germany.
Eur J Emerg Med. 1994 Dec;1(4):193-8.
Differences in the success rates of the pre-hospital or in-hospital resuscitation attempts seem to be attributable to the skill of the various rescuers. Whereas the definite success rate for pre-hospital resuscitation is 7%, the corresponding rate for in-hospital settings is 15%. In this context, the resuscitation skills and the self-assessment of CPR methods of hospital staff were investigated.
during 53 CPR refresher courses offered to nursing staff members, the individual skills and competence in CPR procedures of 425 nurses were examined according to the standards and guidelines of the German Medical Association. During the first part of the study the participants were asked to subjectively rate their proficiencies in CPR followed by a practical assessment of their manual CPR skills by an independent observer. Scores were calculated for artificial ventilation and chest compression. Quality criteria were defined, grouped and analysed statistically by the chi-squared test.
16.2% of the participants felt sufficiently trained to perform CPR independently and 77.2% did not. Thirty-six percent estimated their CPR skills to be sufficient or good. Only four participants (0.9%) were able to perform all standard CPR procedures as recommended by the guidelines and 71.8% failed to perform effective CPR manoeuvres. The CPR skills did not differ with regard to the nurses' educational degree, professional experience, previous CPRs performed or work area within the hospital. Of the nursing staff, 6.6% were found to have good skills in artificial ventilation. The attempts at artificial ventilation made by 58.6% were completely inadequate. Correct chest compression was performed by 14.1%. The majority of the test group (44.7%) failed to carry out effective cardiac message.
CPR skills of hospital staff are inadequate, mainly because of lack of manual dexterity. Obviously the special skills learned in CPR courses are lost in spite of a positive self-assessment after a relatively short time. The results, however, do not suggest completely inadequate handling of CPR procedures in a hospital setting. Indeed, an increasing rate of successful resuscitations inside the hospital (up to 27%) has been reported in the literature. As a consequence of our findings, refresher courses in specific CPR techniques must be demanded, which should be made compulsory for nursing staff every 2 years.
院前或院内复苏尝试成功率的差异似乎归因于不同救援人员的技能。院前复苏的明确成功率为7%,而院内相应的成功率为15%。在此背景下,对医院工作人员的复苏技能及心肺复苏方法的自我评估进行了调查。
在为护理人员提供的53次心肺复苏复习课程期间,根据德国医学协会的标准和指南,对425名护士的心肺复苏程序的个人技能和能力进行了检查。在研究的第一部分,要求参与者主观评价自己在心肺复苏方面的熟练程度,随后由一名独立观察员对他们的徒手心肺复苏技能进行实际评估。计算人工通气和胸外按压的得分。通过卡方检验对质量标准进行定义、分组和统计分析。
16.2%的参与者认为自己接受了足够的培训,可以独立进行心肺复苏,77.2%的参与者则不这么认为。36%的人估计自己的心肺复苏技能足够或良好。只有四名参与者(0.9%)能够按照指南的建议执行所有标准心肺复苏程序,71.8%的人未能进行有效的心肺复苏操作。心肺复苏技能在护士的教育程度、专业经验、以前进行的心肺复苏次数或医院内的工作区域方面没有差异。在护理人员中,发现6.6%的人在人工通气方面技能良好。58.6%的人工通气尝试完全不足。正确进行胸外按压的比例为14.1%。测试组中的大多数人(44.7%)未能进行有效的心脏按压。
医院工作人员的心肺复苏技能不足,主要是因为缺乏手部灵活性。显然,尽管在相对较短的时间后进行了积极的自我评估,但在心肺复苏课程中学到的特殊技能还是丧失了。然而,结果并不表明在医院环境中心肺复苏程序的操作完全不足。实际上,文献中报道医院内成功复苏的比例在上升(高达27%)。鉴于我们的研究结果,必须要求开展特定心肺复苏技术的复习课程,并且应该每两年对护理人员强制执行一次。