Suppr超能文献

在诈病检测中,欺骗性-微妙项目的效用。

Utility of the Deceptive-Subtle items in the detection of malingering.

作者信息

Bagby R M, Nicholson R, Buis T

机构信息

Section on Personality and Psychopathology, Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1998 Jun;70(3):405-15. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa7003_1.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the capacity of a recently developed set of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) subtle items--the Deceptive Subtle scale (DS)--to detect fake-bad responding on the MMPI-2, relative to the capacity of the F scale and the sum of obvious items (Ob) and sum of subtle items (Su) scales. The MMPI-2 was administered to a sample of research participants asked to fake-bad (n=74), and compared to psychiatric outpatients (n=100) and nonclinical participants (n=100) asked to respond honestly. Although the DS scale proved to be a better predictor of fake-bad response style than Su,and comparable to that of Ob, its predictive capacity was substantially less than that of F. Future research is needed to explore the potentially unique contribution of both DS and Ob to assess different strategies of faking-bad.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估最近开发的一组明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI - 2)的微妙项目——欺骗性微妙量表(DS),相对于F量表、明显项目总和(Ob)量表以及微妙项目总和(Su)量表,检测MMPI - 2上假装不良作答的能力。将MMPI - 2施测于一组被要求假装不良作答的研究参与者样本(n = 74),并与被要求诚实作答的精神科门诊患者(n = 100)和非临床参与者(n = 100)进行比较。尽管DS量表被证明比Su量表更能预测假装不良的作答风格,且与Ob量表相当,但其预测能力远低于F量表。未来需要开展研究,以探索DS和Ob在评估不同假装不良策略方面可能具有的独特贡献。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验