Suppr超能文献

明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版(MMPI-2)诈病判别功能指数的编制与验证

Development and validation of the Malingering Discriminant Function Index for the MMPI-2.

作者信息

Bacchiochi Jason R, Bagby R Michael

机构信息

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2006 Aug;87(1):51-61. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_04.

Abstract

The predictive capacity of the MMPI-2 (Butcher et al., 2001) "fake-bad" validity scales (F, FB, and FP) is diminished when respondents have knowledge (i.e., coached) about the operating characteristics of these scales. In this investigation, we endeavored to develop a MMPI-2 fake bad validity index that would be less vulnerable to validity-scale knowledge. Applying discriminant function procedures, we derived a set of weighted Clinical and Content scales that reliably distinguished large samples of validity-scale coached undergraduate research participants instructed to feign mental illness (n = 534) from psychiatric patient samples (n = 590). We subsequently validated this Malingering Discriminant Function Index (M-DFI) in independent samples of research participants (n = 230) and patients (n = 300) and showed relatively less attenuation in predictive capacity compared with F, FB, and FP across uncoached and validity scale coached feigning conditions.

摘要

当被试者了解(即接受过指导)明尼苏达多项人格测验第二版(MMPI - 2,Butcher等人,2001)“伪装不良”效度量表(F、FB和FP)的运作特点时,这些量表的预测能力会减弱。在本研究中,我们致力于开发一种对效度量表知识不太敏感的MMPI - 2伪装不良效度指数。应用判别函数程序,我们得出了一组加权临床量表和内容量表,这些量表能够可靠地将大量接受过效度量表指导、被指示假装患有精神疾病的本科研究参与者样本(n = 534)与精神病患者样本(n = 590)区分开来。随后,我们在独立的研究参与者样本(n = 230)和患者样本(n = 300)中验证了这种诈病判别函数指数(M - DFI),结果表明,与F、FB和FP相比,在未接受指导和接受效度量表指导的假装情境中,M - DFI的预测能力减弱相对较小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验