Suppr超能文献

[临床及超声半月板诊断]

[Clinical and sonographic meniscus diagnosis].

作者信息

Grifka J, Richter J, Gumtau M

机构信息

Orthopädische Universitätsklinik im St. Josef-Hospital, Bochum.

出版信息

Orthopade. 1994 Apr;23(2):102-11.

PMID:8190501
Abstract

Clinical examination still plays an important role in diagnosing meniscal tears. The types of sensitive nerves in the knee joint are responsible for nonspecific pain, which is often correlated with too little specificity in meniscal tests. Ultrasound examination of meniscal structures of the knee joint has been debated extensively in recent years. Criticism of this noninvasive technique was due to small patient groups, improper technical and inaccurate manual standards. Since 1988 ultrasound of the tibial meniscus has become a standard technique in our Department of Orthopaedic Surgery with defined criteria of the intersecting plane and evaluation of ultrasound images. A prospective follow-up study during 6/1988 and 5/1993 including 1186 ultrasound examinations before arthroscopy, was performed. The sensitivity for ultrasound of the lateral meniscus was 58% and for the medial meniscus 83%. Specificity with 98% for the lateral and 90% for the medial meniscus was good. Sonographic detection of meniscal tears depends on the shape and location of meniscal tears. This has been shown by experimental studies in cadavers. A follow-up study including 113 knee joints was performed to prove the value of clinical and ultrasound examination in relation to arthroscopy. The sensitivity of sonography for medial meniscus was 81% and 40% for the lateral meniscus. Although the sensitivity of the clinical examination was 81% (medial) and 47% (lateral), the low specificity of 70% for meniscus tears indicated that it was because of false-positive clinical evaluation of meniscal disorders. In young patients with reflectory muscle spasm and those with acute trauma of the knee joint, clinical examination of the meniscal structures showed poor results. In these cases, too, ultrasound examination showed advantages. Ultrasound of the knee joint meniscus is noninvasive, reproducible and low cost. In cases of uncertain clinical results, ultrasound offers a good opportunity to visualize meniscal disorders.

摘要

临床检查在诊断半月板撕裂中仍起着重要作用。膝关节中的敏感神经类型会引发非特异性疼痛,这在半月板检查中往往特异性不足。近年来,膝关节半月板结构的超声检查一直备受争议。对这种非侵入性技术的批评源于患者群体规模小、技术不当以及手动标准不准确。自1988年以来,胫骨半月板超声检查在我们的骨外科已成为一项标准技术,具有明确的交叉平面标准和超声图像评估方法。我们进行了一项前瞻性随访研究,时间跨度为1988年6月至1993年5月,包括1186例关节镜检查前的超声检查。外侧半月板超声检查的敏感性为58%,内侧半月板为83%。外侧半月板的特异性为98%,内侧半月板为90%,特异性良好。半月板撕裂的超声检测取决于半月板撕裂的形状和位置。尸体实验研究已证实了这一点。我们进行了一项包括113个膝关节的随访研究,以证明临床检查和超声检查相对于关节镜检查的价值。超声检查对内侧半月板的敏感性为81%,对外侧半月板为40%。尽管临床检查的敏感性为内侧81%、外侧47%,但半月板撕裂的特异性低至70%,这表明这是由于对半月板疾病的临床评估出现假阳性。在有反射性肌肉痉挛的年轻患者和膝关节急性创伤患者中,半月板结构的临床检查结果不佳。在这些情况下,超声检查也显示出优势。膝关节半月板超声检查具有非侵入性、可重复性且成本低的特点。在临床结果不确定的情况下,超声检查为观察半月板疾病提供了一个很好的机会。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验