Coates M I
University Museum of Zoology, Cambridge, UK.
Acta Biotheor. 1993 Dec;41(4):411-24. doi: 10.1007/BF00709374.
Current issues concerning the nature of ancestry and homology are discussed with reference to the evolutionary origin of the tetrapod limb. Homologies are argued to be complex conjectural inferences dependent upon a pre-existing phylogenetic analysis and a theoretical model of the evolutionary development of ontogenetic information. Ancestral conditions are inferred primarily from character (synapomorphy/homology) distributions within phylogeny, because of the deficiencies of palaeontological data. Recent analyses of tetrapod limb ontogeny, and the diverse, earliest morphologies known from the fossil record, are inconsistent with typological concepts such as fixed ancestral patterns or bauplans, emphasising the incompatibility of these with evolutionary continuity. The evolutionary origin of the tetrapod limb is also examined in the light of its recent discussion in developmental genetics. While this field promises to reveal more of the fundamental ontogenetic content of homology (identity), at present it is concerned mostly with the abstraction of a new set of types, rather than investigating diversity and change.
结合四足动物肢体的进化起源,讨论了有关祖先特征和同源性本质的当前问题。同源性被认为是复杂的推测性推断,依赖于预先存在的系统发育分析以及个体发育信息进化发展的理论模型。由于古生物学数据的不足,祖先状态主要从系统发育中的性状(共衍征/同源性)分布推断得出。最近对四足动物肢体个体发育的分析,以及化石记录中已知的多样、最早形态,与诸如固定祖先模式或蓝图等类型学概念不一致,强调了这些概念与进化连续性的不相容性。四足动物肢体的进化起源也根据其近期在发育遗传学中的讨论进行了审视。虽然该领域有望揭示更多同源性(同一性)的基本个体发育内容,但目前它主要关注一组新类型的抽象,而不是研究多样性和变化。