Clack J A
University Museum of Zoology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Acta Biotheor. 1993 Dec;41(4):391-409. doi: 10.1007/BF00709373.
This paper examines the middle ear of fossil living animals in terms of the homologies which have been drawn between its parts in different vertebrate groups. Seven homologies are considered: 1, the middle ear cavity/spiracular pouch; 2, the stapes/hyomandibula; 3, the stapedial/hyomandibular processes; 4 the tympanic membrane; 5, the otic notch; 6, the fenestra ovalis; 7, and the stapedial/hyomandibular foramen. The reasons leading to assessments of homology are reviewed. Homologies 1 and 2, based largely on embryological evidence, are fairly robust, though there are arguments about the details. Homologies 3, 4 and 5 stem from ideas about early tetrapod evolution, and were influenced by contingent factors including the order and time of discovery of early fossil taxa, and perceptions of their phylogeny which resulted from this. They were also influenced by ideas of the evolution of terrestriality among tetrapods. Most of the conceptions have been overturned in recent years by new fossil discoveries and new ways of looking at old data. Homology 6 has been little considered. One possible hypothesis, placed in a strictly 'archetypal' theoretical framework has been ignored but deserves consideration on other grounds. Homology 7 depends on how tetrapods are characterised, not a question which has posed difficulties until recently, but which is likely to with the discovery of intermediate fossil forms.
本文从不同脊椎动物类群中耳各部分之间的同源性角度,对化石活体动物的中耳进行了研究。共考虑了七种同源性:1. 中耳腔/鳃裂囊;2. 镫骨/舌颌骨;3. 镫骨/舌颌骨突起;4. 鼓膜;5. 耳凹;6. 卵圆窗;7. 镫骨/舌颌骨孔。文中回顾了得出同源性评估结果的原因。同源性1和2主要基于胚胎学证据,虽然在细节上存在争议,但相当可靠。同源性3、4和5源于对早期四足动物进化的观点,受到了一些偶然因素的影响,包括早期化石类群的发现顺序和时间,以及由此产生的对其系统发育的认识。它们还受到四足动物陆地化进化观点的影响。近年来,由于新的化石发现以及看待旧数据的新方法,这些概念大多已被推翻。同源性6很少被考虑。一个置于严格“原型”理论框架下的可能假设被忽视了,但基于其他理由值得考虑。同源性7取决于四足动物的特征界定方式,这一问题直到最近都没有造成困难,但随着中间化石形式的发现,可能会成为问题。