Haas J S, Cleary P D, Guadagnoli E, Fanta C, Epstein A M
Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Mar;9(3):121-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02600024.
To examine whether differences in intensities of care by socioeconomic status and race result in worse health among adults with asthma post-hospital discharge.
Patients were enrolled during hospitalization and recontacted three months after discharge.
Those aged 18-55 years, with a primary diagnosis of asthma (n = 97).
Regular source of care, "intensive" therapy (use of an anti-inflammatory agent, pulmonary function testing, or an asthma specialist), and patient-reported (Intermediate Activities of Daily Living Scale [IADL] score, dyspnea) and performance-based (peak flow rate) measures of health status post-discharge.
28% of patients with a yearly income less than $16,000 had no regular source of care, compared with 11% of those with an income from $16,000 to $29,999 and no patient with an income of at least $30,000 (p = 0.003). Similarly, intensive therapy was received by 40%, 67%, and 81% of these groups (p = 0.005). Education had similar associations. Patients with no regular source of care or who did not receive intensive therapy had significantly worse health. Patients of lower socioeconomic status had health outcomes that were up to 25% lower than those of patients of higher socioeconomic status (p < 0.05 for differences in LADL score, dyspnea, and peak flow by educational levels and for differences in dyspnea by income levels), after adjustment for age, gender, race, insurance status, and baseline health. After further adjustment for source of care and intensity of therapy, differences in health outcomes by socioeconomic status uniformly decreased in magnitude and only the differences in LADL scores and dyspnea by educational levels remained statistically significant. Although nonwhite patients were less likely to have a regular source of care or to receive intensive therapy, there was no difference in health outcomes by race.
Patients of lower socioeconomic status who have asthma have worse health outcomes post-hospital discharge, which appear to be due in part to less continuous and less intensive treatment.
探讨社会经济地位和种族在出院后哮喘成年患者中护理强度的差异是否会导致健康状况恶化。
患者在住院期间入组,并在出院三个月后再次联系。
年龄在18 - 55岁之间,主要诊断为哮喘(n = 97)。
常规护理来源、“强化”治疗(使用抗炎药、肺功能测试或哮喘专科医生),以及患者报告的(日常生活活动能力量表[IADL]评分、呼吸困难)和基于表现的(峰值流速)出院后健康状况指标。
年收入低于16,000美元的患者中有28%没有常规护理来源,而收入在16,000美元至29,999美元之间的患者这一比例为11%,年收入至少30,000美元的患者中无一人如此(p = 0.003)。同样,这些组中接受强化治疗的比例分别为40%、67%和81%(p = 0.005)。教育程度也有类似关联。没有常规护理来源或未接受强化治疗的患者健康状况明显更差。在调整年龄、性别、种族、保险状况和基线健康状况后,社会经济地位较低的患者的健康结局比社会经济地位较高的患者低25%(按教育程度划分的LADL评分、呼吸困难和峰值流速差异以及按收入水平划分的呼吸困难差异,p < 0.05)。在进一步调整护理来源和治疗强度后,社会经济地位导致的健康结局差异幅度均一致减小,仅按教育程度划分的LADL评分和呼吸困难差异仍具有统计学意义。尽管非白人患者获得常规护理来源或接受强化治疗的可能性较小,但种族在健康结局方面并无差异。
患有哮喘的社会经济地位较低的患者出院后健康结局较差,这似乎部分归因于持续治疗和强化治疗较少。