• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美西律治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变

[Mexiletine in treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy].

作者信息

Stracke H, Meyer U, Schumacher H, Armbrecht U, Beroniade S, Buch K D, Federlin K, Haupt E, Husstedt I W, Kampmann B

机构信息

III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik der Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen.

出版信息

Med Klin (Munich). 1994 Mar 15;89(3):124-31.

PMID:8196572
Abstract

The objective of this double-blind placebo controlled multicenter study was to prove the efficacy of mexiletine in painful diabetic neuropathy. Treatment was provided for in three dosages. For pain measurements a visual analogue scale (VAS) and McGill's verbal rating scale were chosen. 95 patients were included. A global assessment of the VAS showed no differences in treatment. The total evaluation (PRIT = Pain Rating Index Total) of the McGill scale just failed the level of significance. More specific exploratory evaluation of subclasses of the McGill scale, representing different qualities of pain, gave remarkable differences between mexiletine and placebo. According to types of complaints an evaluation showed substantial advantages of the mexiletine treatment with both the VAS and the McGill scale. There is strong evidence that particularly patients with stabbing or burning pain, heat sensations or formication will benefit most by mexiletine therapy. Concerning the dosage, a medium regimen of 450 mg per day seems to be appropriate in this indication. With an increase in dosage the efficacy does not rise proportionally. Mexiletine proved a very safe therapy with negligible side effects at the medium dose range, even less than placebo. There were no cardiovascular side effects. Further investigations should pay more attention to the variety of the complaints and include the quality of life.

摘要

这项双盲、安慰剂对照的多中心研究旨在证明美西律对糖尿病性疼痛性神经病变的疗效。治疗提供了三种剂量。疼痛测量选用了视觉模拟量表(VAS)和麦吉尔言语评定量表。共纳入95例患者。VAS的总体评估显示治疗无差异。麦吉尔量表的总体评估(PRIT = 疼痛评定指数总分)仅未达到显著水平。对麦吉尔量表代表不同疼痛性质的亚类进行更具体的探索性评估,发现美西律与安慰剂之间存在显著差异。根据主诉类型进行的评估显示,美西律治疗在VAS和麦吉尔量表上均具有显著优势。有强有力的证据表明,尤其是患有刺痛或灼痛、热感或蚁走感的患者,将从美西律治疗中获益最多。关于剂量,在该适应症中,每天450毫克的中等剂量方案似乎是合适的。随着剂量增加,疗效并非成比例提高。美西律被证明是一种非常安全的治疗方法,在中等剂量范围内副作用可忽略不计,甚至低于安慰剂。未出现心血管副作用。进一步的研究应更多地关注主诉的多样性,并纳入生活质量。

相似文献

1
[Mexiletine in treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy].美西律治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变
Med Klin (Munich). 1994 Mar 15;89(3):124-31.
2
Mexiletine in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy.美西律治疗糖尿病性神经病变
Diabetes Care. 1992 Nov;15(11):1550-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.15.11.1550.
3
Mexiletine. A review of its therapeutic use in painful diabetic neuropathy.美西律。其在疼痛性糖尿病神经病变中治疗应用的综述。
Drugs. 1998 Oct;56(4):691-707. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199856040-00016.
4
Lacosamide in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a phase 2 double-blind placebo-controlled study.拉科酰胺治疗疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变:一项2期双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Clin J Pain. 2007 Feb;23(2):150-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000210957.39621.b2.
5
Dextromethorphan and quinidine in adult patients with uncontrolled painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a 29-day, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study.右美沙芬和奎尼丁用于成人未控制的疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变患者:一项为期29天的多中心、开放标签、剂量递增研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 Oct;28(10):1607-18. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.10.005.
6
Zonisamide in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.唑尼沙胺治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的试点研究。
Pain Med. 2005 May-Jun;6(3):225-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.05035.x.
7
Mexiletine in the symptomatic treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.美西律用于糖尿病周围神经病变的症状性治疗。
Ann Pharmacother. 1997 Jan;31(1):29-34. doi: 10.1177/106002809703100103.
8
Efficacy and safety of lacosamide in diabetic neuropathic pain: an 18-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial of fixed-dose regimens.拉科酰胺治疗糖尿病性神经病理性疼痛的疗效和安全性:一项为期18周的固定剂量方案双盲安慰剂对照试验。
Clin J Pain. 2009 Jun;25(5):376-85. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318196d2b6.
9
Analgesic efficacy and safety of tramadol/ acetaminophen combination tablets (Ultracet) in treatment of chronic low back pain: a multicenter, outpatient, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial.曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚复方片剂(氨酚曲马多片)治疗慢性下腰痛的镇痛疗效及安全性:一项多中心、门诊、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
J Rheumatol. 2004 Dec;31(12):2454-63.
10
A double-blind comparison of topical capsaicin and oral amitriptyline in painful diabetic neuropathy.辣椒素局部用药与阿米替林口服治疗糖尿病性疼痛性神经病变的双盲对照研究
Adv Ther. 1995 Mar-Apr;12(2):111-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Systemic administration of local anesthetic agents to relieve neuropathic pain.全身给予局部麻醉药以缓解神经性疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD003345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003345.pub2.
2
Pharmacotherapy of painful diabetic neuropathy.疼痛性糖尿病神经病变的药物治疗
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2003 Jun;7(3):169-77. doi: 10.1007/s11916-003-0070-9.
3
Mexiletine. A review of its therapeutic use in painful diabetic neuropathy.美西律。其在疼痛性糖尿病神经病变中治疗应用的综述。
Drugs. 1998 Oct;56(4):691-707. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199856040-00016.