Brandt C P, Priebe P P, Jacobs D G
Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine.
Am Surg. 1994 Jun;60(6):416-20.
Standard diagnostic methods used to evaluate patients sustaining abdominal trauma result in non-therapeutic laparotomy rates ranging from 5 to 40 per cent depending upon the clinical situation. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of diagnostic laparoscopy in the identification of intra-abdominal injuries in stable trauma patients. Twenty-one hemodynamically stable adult patients underwent laparoscopy prior to laparotomy for blunt (n = 10) or penetrating (n = 11) trauma, and the findings from each procedure were directly compared. Laparoscopy was 100 per cent accurate in detecting the need for laparotomy, although a number of specific injuries were not identified. There were no complications related to the procedure. Emergency laparoscopy is safe and should be considered in hemodynamically stable trauma patients with indications for laparotomy based on standard diagnostic criteria in order to minimize the incidence of non-therapeutic laparotomy.
用于评估腹部创伤患者的标准诊断方法导致非治疗性剖腹手术率在5%至40%之间,具体取决于临床情况。本研究的目的是评估诊断性腹腔镜检查在识别稳定创伤患者腹腔内损伤方面的安全性和有效性。21名血流动力学稳定的成年患者在剖腹手术前行腹腔镜检查,其中钝性创伤患者10例,穿透性创伤患者11例,并对每次手术的结果进行直接比较。腹腔镜检查在检测是否需要剖腹手术方面的准确率为100%,尽管有一些特定损伤未被识别。该手术无相关并发症。急诊腹腔镜检查是安全的,对于根据标准诊断标准有剖腹手术指征的血流动力学稳定的创伤患者,应考虑进行急诊腹腔镜检查,以尽量减少非治疗性剖腹手术的发生率。