Parker G, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Wilhelm K, Hickie I, Brodaty H, Boyce P, Mitchell P, Eyers K
University of New South Wales, Australia.
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;164(3):316-26. doi: 10.1192/bjp.164.3.316.
We hypothesised that psychomotor disturbance is specific to the melancholic subtype of depression and capable of defining melancholia more precisely than symptom-based criteria sets. We studied 413 depressed patients, and examined the utility of a refined, operationally driven set of clinician-rated signs, principally against a set of historically accepted symptoms of endogeneity. We specified items defining psychomotor disturbance generally as well as those weighted either to agitation or to retardation. We demonstrated the system's capacity to differentiate 'melancholic' and 'non-melancholic' depression (and the comparable success of DSM-III-R and Newcastle criteria systems) by reference to several patient, illness and treatment response variables, to an independent measure of psychomotor disturbance (reaction time) and to a biological marker (the dexamethasone suppression test).
我们假设精神运动障碍是抑郁的 melancholic 亚型所特有的,并且比基于症状的标准集更能精确地定义 melancholia。我们研究了 413 名抑郁症患者,并检验了一组经过细化、由操作驱动的临床医生评定体征的效用,主要是对照一组历史上公认的内源性症状。我们明确了一般定义精神运动障碍的项目以及那些加权为激越或迟缓的项目。通过参考几个患者、疾病和治疗反应变量、精神运动障碍的独立测量指标(反应时间)以及一个生物学标志物(地塞米松抑制试验),我们证明了该系统区分“melancholic”和“非 melancholic”抑郁症的能力(以及 DSM-III-R 和纽卡斯尔标准系统的类似成功)。