Suppr超能文献

双相抑郁的本质:对忧郁症定义的影响

The nature of bipolar depression: implications for the definition of melancholia.

作者信息

Parker G, Roy K, Wilhelm K, Mitchell P, Hadzi-Pavlovic D

机构信息

Mood Disorders Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, and School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, 2031, Randwick, Australia.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2000 Sep;59(3):217-24. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00144-5.

Abstract

AIM

To examine if melancholic depression is over-represented in those with 'bipolar depression' and, if confirmed, to use that phenomenon to assist the clinical definition of melancholia.

METHODS

We contrast 83 bipolar and 904 unipolar depressed patients on three melancholic sub-typing systems (DSM, Clinical and CORE system) and compare representation of their clinical depressive features.

RESULTS

By all three melancholic sub-typing systems, the bipolar patients were more likely to receive diagnoses of 'melancholia' and of psychotic depression. To the extent that this differential prevalence of depressive sub-types was reflected in varying patterns of clinical features, we so indirectly identified a set of items defining 'melancholia'. By such a strategy, melancholia was most clearly distinguished by behaviourally-rated psychomotor disturbance. While a number of 'endogeneity symptoms' were significantly over-represented, logistic regression analyses refined the set to psychomotor disturbance (both as a symptom and as a sign) and pathological guilt. We also established a distinctly higher prevalence of bipolar depression in those where a refined diagnosis of melancholia was made.

CONCLUSIONS

Bipolar depression appears to be more likely to be 'melancholic' in type, thus providing an indirect strategy for the clinical definition of melancholia.

摘要

目的

探讨在“双相抑郁”患者中, melancholic 抑郁是否比例过高;若得到证实,则利用该现象辅助 melancholia 的临床定义。

方法

我们在三种 melancholic 亚型分类系统(DSM、临床和CORE系统)上对比了83例双相抑郁患者和904例单相抑郁患者,并比较了他们临床抑郁特征的表现。

结果

在所有三种 melancholic 亚型分类系统中,双相抑郁患者更有可能被诊断为“melancholia”和精神病性抑郁。鉴于抑郁亚型的这种差异患病率反映在不同的临床特征模式中,我们由此间接确定了一组定义“melancholia”的项目。通过这种策略,melancholia 最明显的区别在于行为评定的精神运动性障碍。虽然一些“内源性症状”明显比例过高,但逻辑回归分析将这组症状细化为精神运动性障碍(既是症状也是体征)和病理性内疚。我们还发现,在那些做出了细化的 melancholia 诊断的患者中,双相抑郁的患病率明显更高。

结论

双相抑郁在类型上似乎更有可能是“melancholic”,从而为 melancholia 的临床定义提供了一种间接策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验