Ahluwalia N K, Thompson D G, Barlow J, Heggie L
Department of Medicine, University of Manchester Medical School, Hope Hospital.
Gut. 1994 May;35(5):625-30. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.5.625.
Small intestinal intraluminal pressure activity and aboral traction forces were explored in 19 healthy volunteers using a combined manometry and traction force detecting assembly sited in the upper small intestine. Each aboral traction event was classified as being associated with either a propagating or a stationary contraction and its force measured. During phase I no contractions or traction events were seen. During phase II, traction events related to propagating contractions mean (SEM) (2.2 (0.2)/min) and to stationary contractions (0.3 (0.1)/min) generated similar force/event (7.5(0.9 g v 8.7 (1.4) g, p > 0.05). During phase III, all traction events were related to propagating contractions and generated 9.3 (2.4) g force/event (p > 0.05 v phase II). After feeding, traction events related to propagating contractions generated similar force/event to those related to stationary contractions (5.9 (1.0) g v 9.3 (2.7) g, p > 0.05 v each other and v fasting). No consistent pattern was seen in the temporal distribution of the traction events or in the pattern of the amplitude of the force of successive traction events.
使用置于小肠上段的联合测压与牵拉力检测装置,对19名健康志愿者的小肠腔内压力活动和向肛牵拉力进行了探究。每次向肛牵引事件被分类为与传播性收缩或静止性收缩相关,并测量其力量。在第一阶段,未观察到收缩或牵引事件。在第二阶段,与传播性收缩相关的牵引事件平均(标准误)为(2.2(0.2)/分钟),与静止性收缩相关的牵引事件为(0.3(0.1)/分钟),每次事件产生的力量相似(7.5(0.9)克对8.7(1.4)克,p>0.05)。在第三阶段,所有牵引事件均与传播性收缩相关,每次事件产生9.3(2.4)克的力量(与第二阶段相比,p>0.05)。进食后,与传播性收缩相关的牵引事件每次事件产生的力量与与静止性收缩相关的牵引事件相似(5.9(1.0)克对9.3(2.7)克,彼此之间以及与禁食状态相比,p>0.05)。在牵引事件的时间分布或连续牵引事件力量幅度模式方面未观察到一致的模式。