Franklyn J A, Black E G, Betteridge J, Sheppard M C
Department of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994 Jun;78(6):1368-71. doi: 10.1210/jcem.78.6.8200938.
We compared serum TSH results determined in second and third generation assays in patients with thyroid disease and nonthyroidal illnesses (NTIs) to evaluate the usefulness of the more sensitive assay. We studied 19 subjects with untreated hyperthyroidism, 12 hyperthyroid subjects sampled at 4-week intervals after beginning carbimazole, 153 subjects receiving T4 replacement, and 300 hospital in-patients with a variety of NTIs. Serum TSH was measured, using a second generation immunometric method, together with free T4 and free T3. Samples with subnormal TSH (< 0.5 mU/L) were reassayed, using a more sensitive chemiluminescent immunometric method. Both assays revealed undetectable serum TSH levels in 18 of 19 overtly hyperthyroid patients. Undetectable TSH values (in both assays) were found in 30 of 33 patients with low serum TSH levels who were receiving treatment for hyperthyroidism, in association with normal thyroid hormone levels in 11. Undetectable TSH was evident in both patients receiving T4 and those with NTI, but use of the more sensitive assay led to a reduction in the number of subjects with undetectable TSH compared with the second generation results (T4-treated, 55 vs. 77 cases; NTI, 13 vs. 19 cases). There was a significant correlation between serum TSH and free T4 in the whole group on T4 (P < 0.001) and in those receiving T4 with low TSH (r = -0.33; P < 0.05); no significant correlation was evident in subjects with low serum TSH levels associated with NTI. An improvement in assay sensitivity led to a reduction in the number of patients being treated with T4 or with NTI in whom serum TSH was undetectable and, hence, an increase in those in whom overt hyperthyroidism could be excluded. Undetectable TSH results, even in a third generation assay, are not diagnostic of overt hyperthyroidism, but are also found in subjects with treated thyroid disease and NTI.
我们比较了第二代和第三代检测方法测定的甲状腺疾病和非甲状腺疾病(NTIs)患者的血清促甲状腺激素(TSH)结果,以评估更敏感检测方法的实用性。我们研究了19例未经治疗的甲状腺功能亢进患者、12例开始服用卡比马唑后每隔4周采样一次的甲状腺功能亢进患者、153例接受T4替代治疗的患者以及300例患有各种NTIs的住院患者。采用第二代免疫测定法测量血清TSH,同时检测游离T4和游离T3。对促甲状腺激素水平低于正常(<0.5 mU/L)的样本,使用更敏感的化学发光免疫测定法重新检测。两种检测方法均显示19例明显甲状腺功能亢进患者中有18例血清TSH水平检测不到。在33例接受甲状腺功能亢进治疗且血清TSH水平较低的患者中,有30例(两种检测方法)TSH值检测不到,其中11例甲状腺激素水平正常。接受T4治疗的患者和患有NTIs的患者中均有TSH检测不到的情况,但与第二代检测结果相比,使用更敏感的检测方法导致TSH检测不到的受试者数量减少(接受T4治疗的患者,55例对77例;患有NTIs的患者,13例对19例)。在整个接受T4治疗的组中(P<0.001)以及TSH水平较低的接受T4治疗的患者中(r = -0.33;P<0.05),血清TSH与游离T4之间存在显著相关性;在与NTIs相关的血清TSH水平较低的受试者中,未发现明显的显著相关性。检测灵敏度的提高导致接受T4治疗或患有NTIs且血清TSH检测不到的患者数量减少,因此,可排除明显甲状腺功能亢进的患者数量增加。即使在第三代检测中,TSH检测不到的结果也不能诊断为明显的甲状腺功能亢进,在接受治疗的甲状腺疾病患者和患有NTIs的患者中也会出现。