Turner S M, Beidel D C, Jacob R G
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29407.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Apr;62(2):350-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.62.2.350.
Seventy-two social phobics were randomly assigned to behavioral (flooding) or drug treatment with atenolol or placebo. Treatment was administered over a 3-month period of time, and duration of treatment effects was determined at a 6-month follow-up assessment. Multiple measures of outcome were used, including self-report, clinician ratings (including assessment by independent evaluators), behavioral assessment, and performance on composite indexes. The results indicated that flooding consistently was superior to placebo, whereas atenolol was not. Flooding also was superior to atenolol on behavioral measures and composite indexes. Those subjects who improved during treatment maintained gains at the 6-month follow-up regardless of whether they received flooding or atenolol. The variability of outcome on different measures in social phobia research is discussed, and the need for broad-based treatment strategies to address the pervasive deficits associated with social phobia is noted.
72名社交恐惧症患者被随机分配接受行为治疗(冲击疗法)或使用阿替洛尔或安慰剂进行药物治疗。治疗为期3个月,治疗效果的持续时间在6个月的随访评估中确定。采用了多种结果测量方法,包括自我报告、临床医生评分(包括独立评估者的评估)、行为评估以及综合指标表现。结果表明,冲击疗法始终优于安慰剂,而阿替洛尔则不然。在行为测量和综合指标方面,冲击疗法也优于阿替洛尔。无论接受冲击疗法还是阿替洛尔治疗,那些在治疗期间有所改善的受试者在6个月随访时都保持了疗效。文中讨论了社交恐惧症研究中不同测量方法结果的变异性,并指出需要采用基础广泛的治疗策略来解决与社交恐惧症相关的普遍缺陷。