Suppr超能文献

日抛型水凝胶镜片——与两周更换型镜片的比较。

Daily disposed hydrogel lenses--a comparison with biweekly replacement.

作者信息

Snyder C, Hammack G G

机构信息

Department of Optometry, School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35294-0010.

出版信息

J Am Optom Assoc. 1994 Mar;65(3):164-8.

PMID:8201166
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hydrogel lenses worn daily and disposed of daily represent an extreme of the spectrum of prescribing that has not been extensively investigated. This study was undertaken to ascertain whether hydrogel lenses worn on a daily replacement schedule displayed differences in patient comfort, vision, and physiological response and as compared to lenses replaced biweekly.

METHODS

Hydrogel lens wearing schedules were devised to allow the patient to, in a masked fashion, directly compare the characteristics of a 1-day-old hydrogel lens to that of one 2 weeks old. Eighteen qualifying subjects wore Bausch & Lomb Seequence 2 lenses in this investigation.

RESULTS

There was neither a significant difference in visual acuity, lens condition, and corneal or bulbar conjunctival fluorescein staining, nor a significant difference in subjective ratings of wearing comfort and clarity of vision between the 1-day and biweekly worn lenses.

CONCLUSIONS

No apparent advantage was found in replacing the evaluated hydrogel lenses on a daily vs. biweekly schedule when considering vision, comfort, and physiological response of the eye.

摘要

背景

每日佩戴并每日丢弃的水凝胶镜片代表了一种尚未得到广泛研究的配镜方式。本研究旨在确定按每日更换方案佩戴的水凝胶镜片在患者舒适度、视力和生理反应方面是否与每两周更换一次的镜片存在差异。

方法

设计水凝胶镜片佩戴方案,让患者以盲法直接比较1日龄水凝胶镜片与2周龄水凝胶镜片的特性。18名符合条件的受试者在本研究中佩戴博士伦Seequence 2镜片。

结果

1日龄镜片和每两周更换一次的镜片在视力、镜片状况、角膜或球结膜荧光素染色方面均无显著差异,佩戴舒适度和视力清晰度的主观评分也无显著差异。

结论

在考虑眼睛的视力、舒适度和生理反应时,每日更换与每两周更换所评估的水凝胶镜片相比,未发现明显优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验