Injured consumers and the FDA. Should federal preemption protect medical device manufacturers under a quasi-governmental immunity?
作者信息
Truitt B I
机构信息
Southern Illinois University School of Law, Carbondale 62901.
出版信息
J Leg Med. 1994 Mar;15(1):155-84. doi: 10.1080/01947649409510940.
PMID:8201276
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Injured consumers and the FDA. Should federal preemption protect medical device manufacturers under a quasi-governmental immunity?
J Leg Med. 1994 Mar;15(1):155-84. doi: 10.1080/01947649409510940.
2
Medical devices; preemption of state product liability claims--FDA. Withdrawal of proposed rule.医疗器械；州产品责任索赔的优先适用——美国食品药品监督管理局。撤回拟议规则。
Fed Regist. 1998 Jul 24;63(142):39789-90.
3
4
Medical devices; preemption of state product liability claims--FDA. Proposed rule.医疗器械；州产品责任索赔的优先适用——美国食品药品监督管理局。拟议规则。
Fed Regist. 1997 Dec 12;62(239):65384-8.
5
Medical device preemption after Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr.美敦力公司诉洛尔案后的医疗器械优先适用权
Food Drug Law J. 1996;51(4):619-29.
6
Medical devices; preemption of state product liability claims--FDA. Correction.医疗器械；州产品责任索赔的优先适用——美国食品药品监督管理局。更正。
Fed Regist. 1997 Dec 17;62(242):66179.
7
8
The FDA defense: a prescription for easing the pain of punitive damage awards in medical products liability cases.美国食品药品监督管理局的辩护：缓解医疗产品责任案件中惩罚性损害赔偿裁决痛苦的一剂良方。
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law. 1997 Sep(223):9-45.
9
Preemption and medical devices: a response to Adler and Mann.优先购买权与医疗设备：对阿德勒和曼的回应
Food Drug Law J. 1996;51(1):1-19.
10
The Lohr decision: FDA perspective and position.洛尔案裁决：美国食品药品监督管理局的观点与立场
Food Drug Law J. 1997;52(1):7-11.
Zotero 插件