Suppr超能文献

急性缺血性卒中中的神经节苷脂GM1。SASS试验。

Ganglioside GM1 in acute ischemic stroke. The SASS Trial.

出版信息

Stroke. 1994 Jun;25(6):1141-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.6.1141.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of ganglioside GM1 in acute (< or = 48 hours), anterior circulation ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We screened more than 5000 patients at 13 centers in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-treatment, clinical trial and enrolled 287 patients. They received 100 mg GM1 or placebo intramuscularly daily for 28 days and were evaluated regularly for 84 days. Number of deaths, the Toronto Stroke Scale, and the Barthel Index were primary outcomes; improvements on the Fugl-Meyer Scale and on a neuropsychological battery were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The groups were balanced for severity, side of stroke, age, sex, race, years of schooling, prior illness, and depression scores. Analyzable data were available on 275 patients; 217 patients completed the trial. Protocol-specified primary and secondary outcome measures showed no significant difference between treatment arms. However, improvement from baseline in the motor component of the Toronto Stroke Scale favored the GM1-treated group at day 28 when GM1 treatment stopped (P = .020); at day 84, the difference still favored the GM1-treated group (P = .057). All 10 components of the Barthel Index, the Fugl-Meyer Scale, and four of the five tests in the neuropsychological battery also favored the GM1 group. Adverse experiences were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

GM1 is safe. However, since only certain post hoc tests showed statistically significant differences or trends favoring GM1, another clinical trial is needed to demonstrate efficacy.

摘要

背景与目的

我们试图评估神经节苷脂GM1治疗急性(≤48小时)前循环缺血性卒中的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们在13个中心进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行治疗的临床试验,筛选了5000多名患者,纳入287例患者。他们每天接受100mg GM1或安慰剂肌肉注射,共28天,并进行84天的定期评估。死亡人数、多伦多卒中量表和巴氏指数为主要结局指标;Fugl-Meyer量表和神经心理成套测验的改善情况为次要结局指标。

结果

两组在严重程度、卒中部位、年龄、性别、种族、受教育年限、既往疾病和抑郁评分方面均衡。275例患者有可分析的数据;217例患者完成了试验。方案规定的主要和次要结局指标在治疗组之间无显著差异。然而,在GM1治疗停止的第28天,多伦多卒中量表运动部分相对于基线的改善情况有利于GM1治疗组(P = 0.020);在第84天,差异仍有利于GM1治疗组(P = 0.057)。巴氏指数的所有10个项目、Fugl-Meyer量表以及神经心理成套测验五项测试中的四项也有利于GM1组。两组的不良事件相似。

结论

GM1是安全的。然而,由于只有某些事后检验显示出有利于GM1的统计学显著差异或趋势,因此需要另一项临床试验来证明其疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验