Cohen S L, Pedersen J, Kinney G G, Myers J
Department of Psychology, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania 17815.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):375-87. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-375.
The effects of experimental history on responding under a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement were examined. Sixteen pigeons were divided into four equal groups. Groups 1 to 3 were trained to peck a key for food under a fixed-ratio, variable-ratio, or differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule of reinforcement. After training, these pigeons were shifted to a progressive-ratio schedule, later were shifted back to their original schedule (with decreased rates of reinforcement), and finally were returned to the progressive-ratio schedule. Pigeons in Group 4 (control) were maintained on the progressive-ratio schedule for the entire experiment. To test for potential "latent history" effects, pigeons responding under the progressive-ratio schedule were injected with d-amphetamine and given behavioral-momentum tests of prefeeding and extinction. Experimental histories affected responding in the immediate transition to the progressive-ratio schedule; response rates of pigeons with variable-ratio and fixed-ratio histories were higher than rates of pigeons with differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate and progressive-ratio-only histories. Pigeons with differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate histories, and to a lesser degree pigeons with variable-ratio and fixed-ratio histories, also had shorter postreinforcement pauses than pigeons with only a progressive-ratio history. No consistent long-term effects of prior contingencies on responding under the progressive-ratio schedule were evident. d-Amphetamine and resistance-to-change tests failed to reveal consistent latent history effects. The data suggest that history effects are sometimes transitory and not susceptible to latent influences.
研究了实验经历对在累进比率强化程序下反应的影响。16只鸽子被分成四组,每组数量相等。第1组到第3组分别在固定比率、可变比率或低比率差别强化的强化程序下接受训练,通过啄键获取食物。训练后,这些鸽子被转换到累进比率程序,之后又回到原来的程序(强化率降低),最后再回到累进比率程序。第4组(对照组)的鸽子在整个实验过程中一直处于累进比率程序。为了测试潜在的“潜伏历史”效应,给在累进比率程序下反应的鸽子注射右旋苯丙胺,并进行预喂和消退的行为动量测试。实验经历在刚转换到累进比率程序时影响反应;有可变比率和固定比率经历的鸽子的反应率高于有低比率差别强化和仅累进比率经历的鸽子。有低比率差别强化经历的鸽子,以及在较小程度上有可变比率和固定比率经历的鸽子,与只有累进比率经历的鸽子相比,强化后停顿时间也更短。先前的强化程序对在累进比率程序下反应没有明显的长期持续影响。右旋苯丙胺和抗变化测试未能揭示出一致的潜伏历史效应。数据表明,历史效应有时是短暂的,不易受到潜伏影响。