Aoki N
Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Ohkubo Hospital, Japan.
J Neurosurg. 1994 Jul;81(1):20-3. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.81.1.0020.
The pathological process of extracerebral fluid collections in infancy includes subdural effusion and enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces. Both conditions have traditionally been investigated as a single clinical entity, because of difficulty in differentiating between them. The prognosis of subdural effusion is not as benign as that of enlargement of subarachnoid spaces, requiring differential diagnosis between these disorders. The present study was conducted to elucidate whether this differentiation could be made on magnetic resonance (MR) images. The series consisted of 16 infants aged 10 months or younger, including eight with verified subdural effusion and eight in whom a diagnosis of enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces was achieved by neuroimaging studies other than MR imaging. In all eight patients with subdural effusion, the intensity of the fluid was greater than that of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in at least one of the sequences using T1-weighted, proton-density, and T2-weighted MR images. The flow-void sign, indicating vessels in the fluid spaces, was not seen in any of these eight patients. On the other hand, in all eight patients with enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces, the fluid was isointense in relation to CSF, and vascular flow-void areas were seen in at least one of the MR imaging sequences. Based on these observations, it is concluded that differentiation between subdural effusion and enlargement of the subarachnoid spaces can be established by focusing on two aspects of MR imaging findings: 1) the intensity of the fluid, which is either iso- or hyperintense relative to CSF, and 2) the presence or absence of vascular flow-void areas in the fluid spaces.
婴儿期脑外积液的病理过程包括硬膜下积液和蛛网膜下腔增宽。由于难以区分这两种情况,传统上一直将这两种病症作为一个单一的临床实体进行研究。硬膜下积液的预后不如蛛网膜下腔增宽那样良好,因此需要对这些病症进行鉴别诊断。本研究旨在阐明是否可以通过磁共振(MR)图像进行这种区分。该系列研究纳入了16名10个月及以下的婴儿,其中8名确诊为硬膜下积液,另外8名通过非MR成像的神经影像学检查诊断为蛛网膜下腔增宽。在所有8例硬膜下积液患者中,在使用T1加权、质子密度和T2加权MR图像的至少一个序列中,液体的信号强度高于脑脊液(CSF)。这8例患者中均未见到提示液体间隙中有血管的流空信号。另一方面,在所有8例蛛网膜下腔增宽患者中,液体在MR成像序列中至少有一个序列与CSF等信号,并且可见血管流空区域。基于这些观察结果,得出结论:硬膜下积液和蛛网膜下腔增宽之间的区分可以通过关注MR成像结果的两个方面来确定:1)液体的信号强度,相对于CSF为等信号或高信号;2)液体间隙中是否存在血管流空区域。