Suppr超能文献

用于切开的电灼术不会增加伤口感染率。

Electrocautery used to create incisions does not increase wound infection rates.

作者信息

Groot G, Chappell E W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1994 Jun;167(6):601-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(94)90106-6.

Abstract

A prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial was conducted to determine whether electrocautery as a means of creating abdominal or thoracic wounds would result in increased wound infection rates. Over a 15-month period, 492 consecutively studied patients were randomly placed into 1 of 2 groups: scalpel or electrocautery. There were no differences in age grouping, use of steroids, incidence of diabetes, number of days preoperative, operative time, use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, use of drains, number of obese patients, or gender ratio. Wound infections developed in 38 of the 250 scalpel patients (15%) and in 30 of the 242 cautery patients (12%). The use of electrocautery to create surgical wounds does not increase wound infection rates.

摘要

进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验,以确定使用电灼术制造腹部或胸部伤口是否会导致伤口感染率增加。在15个月的时间里,492例连续研究的患者被随机分为两组:手术刀组或电灼术组。两组在年龄分组、类固醇使用情况、糖尿病发病率、术前天数、手术时间、术前抗生素预防使用情况、引流管使用情况、肥胖患者数量或性别比例方面均无差异。250例手术刀组患者中有38例(15%)发生伤口感染,242例电灼术组患者中有30例(12%)发生伤口感染。使用电灼术制造手术伤口不会增加伤口感染率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验