Wilson D M, Anderson R L
Division of Nephrology and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1993 Oct;100(4):419-24. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/100.4.419.
Proteinuria evaluation is important for the differential diagnosis of renal disease and the assessment of prognosis and response to therapy. Qualitative proteinuria correlates poorly with quantitative 24-hour protein levels because of hydration and methodologic problems associated with observer error. The authors automated quantitative urinary protein and osmolality measurements and evaluated whether a urinary protein-osmolality ratio (mg/L/mOsm/kg) in the random urinalysis predicts the 24-hour urine protein level. They compared this ratio with the (1) 24-hour protein levels in 78 normal women and 53 normal men; (2) 24-hour protein levels in 129 proteinuric patients; and (3) urinary protein-creatinine ratio in 131 normal patients and 105 proteinuric patients. The normal urinary protein-osmolality ratio was less than 0.12 (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 93%). This compared to a urinary protein-creatinine ratio of less than 0.05 (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 90%). A urinary protein-osmolality ratio of greater than 2.5 indicates a level of more than 3.0 g/24 hour (sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 98%). The urinary protein-osmolality ratio = 1.12x + 0.05 (r = 0.88), where x = 24-hour protein. The authors conclude that the quantitative urinary protein-osmolality ratio is better than a qualitative urinalysis and urinary protein-urinary creatinine ratio for detecting or assessing abnormal proteinuria and allows for a reasonable prediction of 24-hour protein levels.
蛋白尿评估对于肾脏疾病的鉴别诊断、预后评估以及治疗反应评估都很重要。由于水化作用以及与观察者误差相关的方法学问题,定性蛋白尿与24小时定量蛋白水平的相关性较差。作者实现了尿蛋白和尿渗透压测量的自动化,并评估随机尿液分析中的尿蛋白-渗透压比值(mg/L/mOsm/kg)是否能预测24小时尿蛋白水平。他们将该比值与以下各项进行了比较:(1)78名正常女性和53名正常男性的24小时蛋白水平;(2)129名蛋白尿患者的24小时蛋白水平;以及(3)131名正常患者和105名蛋白尿患者的尿蛋白-肌酐比值。正常尿蛋白-渗透压比值小于0.12(敏感性为96%;特异性为93%)。相比之下,尿蛋白-肌酐比值小于0.05(敏感性为96%;特异性为90%)。尿蛋白-渗透压比值大于2.5表明24小时蛋白水平超过3.0 g(敏感性为91%;特异性为98%)。尿蛋白-渗透压比值 = 1.12x + 0.05(r = 0.88),其中x = 24小时蛋白量。作者得出结论,定量尿蛋白-渗透压比值在检测或评估异常蛋白尿方面优于定性尿液分析和尿蛋白-尿肌酐比值,并且能够合理预测24小时蛋白水平。