Ferrell L D, Crawford J M, Dhillon A P, Scheuer P J, Nakanuma Y
Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0102.
Am J Surg Pathol. 1993 Nov;17(11):1113-23. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199311000-00004.
Although current literature contains many cases of putative premalignant hepatocellular proliferations and small hepatocellular carcinomas, no consistent nomenclature and diagnostic criteria have been put forward to describe them. These nodules, which are being detected by radiographic techniques in cirrhotic livers and removed during transplantation procedures, represent a new and challenging histologic spectrum of liver pathology. In this study, a multinational panel of five liver pathologists reviewed 23 such nodules and were able to reach a consensus on the diagnostic criteria and to devise a standard nomenclature to describe the histologic lesions. We recommend that benign nodules showing little histologic difference from cirrhotic nodules be classified as regenerative or macroregenerative, and nodules with atypical features not diagnostic of carcinoma be classified as borderline. Such standardization should facilitate further study of the pathologic features and clinical behavior of these lesions.
尽管当前文献中有许多假定的癌前肝细胞增殖和小肝细胞癌的病例,但尚未提出一致的命名法和诊断标准来描述它们。这些结节通过影像学技术在肝硬化肝脏中被检测到,并在移植手术中被切除,代表了肝脏病理学中一个新的且具有挑战性的组织学谱。在本研究中,由五位肝脏病理学家组成的跨国小组对23个这样的结节进行了评估,并就诊断标准达成了共识,还设计了一种标准命名法来描述组织学病变。我们建议,与肝硬化结节在组织学上差异不大的良性结节应分类为再生性或大再生性结节,具有非癌性非典型特征的结节应分类为临界性结节。这种标准化应有助于对这些病变的病理特征和临床行为进行进一步研究。