Schwender D, Müller A, Madler M, Faber-Züllig E, Ilmberger J
Institut für Anästhesiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
Anaesthesist. 1993 Sep;42(9):583-91.
Recent changes in the medical system have resulted in a significant increase of ambulatory surgical procedures. Therefore, a safe and short postoperative recovery period and, especially, the full recovery of complex psychological function after general anaesthesia have become increasingly important. In the present study we investigated the recovery of psychomotor and cognitive function after general anaesthesia with propofol/alfentanil and thiopentone/isoflurane/alfentanil. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Institutional approval and informed consent was obtained in 40 female ASA I or II patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy. As oral premedication the patients received chloracepat (10-20 mg) 45 min before the start of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced in group I with propofol (2.5 mg/kg) and maintained with propofol (6-12 mg/kg/h)/alfentanil (0.05 mg/kg) and 50% N2O in O2. The patients of group II received thiopentone (5 mg/kg) for induction and isoflurane (0.5-1.5 vol%)/alfentanil (0.05 mg/kg) and 50% N2O in O2 for maintenance of general anaesthesia. In particular we measured the following parameters: (1) The recovery time, defined as the interval between the termination of the anesthetic and the patient's correct recall of her birth date. (2) The choice reaction times to optical stimuli (red or green light), which was used as a parameter for attention and psychomotor function. (3) The score in the "Zahlen-Verbindungs-Test" in which the patients had to connect numbers from 1 to 90 in correct order. This is also a parameter to quantify attention and psychomotor function. (4) The digit span which is a value derived from the number of correctly reproduced digits from a list presented to the patients. It is a measure of numerical memory. (5) The Munich Verbal Learning Test, which is the German version of the California Verbal Learning Test. It represents the number of correctly reproduced words from a previously presented list and is a measure of the verbal memory. (6) The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, which serves to test the ability to plan and act and to form terms and concepts. (7) The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, to quantify state anxiety. (8) Pain score, using a visual analogue scale. The tests were performed at four measurement points: the day before the operation and 30, 60, and 240 min after recovery. The "Zahlen-Verbindungs-Test", the digit span and the Munich Verbal Learning Test were presented in four parallel forms to minimize learning effects. For statistical analysis of the data the Wilcoxon test was employed within groups and the Mann-Whitney test between groups. RESULTS. The groups were comparable in age, weight, height and level of education. No significant difference was found between them in operation or anaesthesia time or in the total dosage of alfentanil. Recovery time in the propofol group was, at 10 min, significantly shorter than in the isoflurane group, with 16 min. Choice reaction times were significantly increased 30 min after recovery from anaesthesia in both groups. In the propofol group they returned to normal after 60 min, whereas in the isoflurane group significant increases could be observed even 240 min after recovery from the anaesthetic. Choice reaction times were significantly longer in the isoflurane group than in the propofol group 60 min and 240 min after anaesthesia. In the "Zahlen-Verbindungs-Test" the patients showed significantly worse results 30 min and 60 min after anaesthesia. The propofol group tended to be better than the isoflurane group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Also in the digit span, the scores were significantly lower 30 min after recovery from the anaesthetic. Here again the propofol group tended to be a little better than the isoflurane group 30 min, 60 min and 240 min after anaesthesia. In the Munich Verbal Learning Test both groups had lower scores 30 min and 60 min, the isoflurane group also 240 min, after recovery...
医疗系统最近的变化导致门诊手术数量显著增加。因此,安全且短暂的术后恢复期,尤其是全身麻醉后复杂心理功能的完全恢复变得越来越重要。在本研究中,我们调查了丙泊酚/阿芬太尼和硫喷妥钠/异氟烷/阿芬太尼全身麻醉后精神运动和认知功能的恢复情况。患者与方法。对40例接受诊断性腹腔镜检查的ASA I或II级女性患者获得了机构批准并取得了知情同意。作为口服术前用药,患者在麻醉开始前45分钟接受氯氮卓(10 - 20毫克)。I组患者用丙泊酚(2.5毫克/千克)诱导麻醉,并用丙泊酚(6 - 12毫克/千克/小时)/阿芬太尼(0.05毫克/千克)和50%氧化亚氮与氧气混合维持麻醉。II组患者用硫喷妥钠(5毫克/千克)诱导麻醉,并用异氟烷(0.5 - 1.5体积%)/阿芬太尼(0.05毫克/千克)和50%氧化亚氮与氧气混合维持全身麻醉。特别地,我们测量了以下参数:(1)恢复时间,定义为麻醉结束至患者正确回忆其出生日期的间隔。(2)对视觉刺激(红灯或绿灯)的选择反应时间,用作注意力和精神运动功能的参数。(3)“数字连线测试”得分,患者必须按正确顺序连接从1到90的数字。这也是量化注意力和精神运动功能的参数。(4)数字广度,它是根据向患者呈现的列表中正确复述的数字数量得出的值。它是数字记忆的一种度量。(5)慕尼黑言语学习测试,它是加利福尼亚言语学习测试的德文版。它代表从先前呈现的列表中正确复述的单词数量,是言语记忆的一种度量。(6)威斯康星卡片分类测试,用于测试计划和行动以及形成术语和概念的能力。(7)状态 - 特质焦虑量表,用于量化状态焦虑。(8)疼痛评分,使用视觉模拟量表。测试在四个测量点进行:手术前一天以及恢复后30、60和240分钟。“数字连线测试”、数字广度和慕尼黑言语学习测试以四种平行形式呈现,以尽量减少学习效应。对于数据的统计分析,组内采用威尔科克森检验,组间采用曼 - 惠特尼检验。结果。两组在年龄、体重、身高和教育水平方面具有可比性。在手术时间、麻醉时间或阿芬太尼总剂量方面未发现两组之间有显著差异。丙泊酚组的恢复时间为10分钟,明显短于异氟烷组的16分钟。两组患者麻醉恢复后30分钟时选择反应时间均显著增加。丙泊酚组在60分钟后恢复正常,而异氟烷组在麻醉恢复后240分钟时仍可观察到显著增加。麻醉后60分钟和240分钟时,异氟烷组的选择反应时间明显长于丙泊酚组。在“数字连线测试”中,患者在麻醉后30分钟和60分钟时结果明显较差。丙泊酚组倾向于比异氟烷组好,但差异未达到统计学意义。同样在数字广度方面,麻醉恢复后30分钟时得分显著较低。在麻醉后30、60和240分钟时,丙泊酚组再次倾向于比异氟烷组略好一点。在慕尼黑言语学习测试中,两组在恢复后30分钟和60分钟时得分较低,异氟烷组在恢复后240分钟时也较低……