Mihăilescu L
Institute of Neurology and Psychiatry, Bucharest, Romania.
Rom J Neurol Psychiatry. 1993 Apr-Jun;31(2):85-96.
The purpose of this study was to analyze some aspects of communicative capacities in 25 predominantly Wernicke's aphasics. The patients with moderate and mild deficits were compared with severely affected patients. Answers in a standard interview were studied for two aspects: answer adequacy to question and conceptual thinking fluency. An initial examination was carried out in the first stage of aphasia and the second examination took place after 3 or 4 months since onset. Both parameters showed more important deficits in the group with severe disorders at onset. An improvement of communicative capacity was also noticed in both groups. The factors involved were discussed pointing out that wrong answers were not exclusively determined by a difficulty of auditory comprehension but by some deficits of conceptual thinking fluency or some other cognitive processes.
本研究的目的是分析25名主要为韦尼克失语症患者的沟通能力的某些方面。将中度和轻度缺陷患者与重度受影响患者进行比较。对标准访谈中的回答从两个方面进行研究：回答对问题的充分性和概念性思维流畅性。在失语症的第一阶段进行了初步检查，第二次检查在发病后3或4个月进行。两个参数在发病时严重障碍组中均显示出更严重的缺陷。两组的沟通能力也都有改善。讨论了涉及的因素，指出错误答案并非完全由听觉理解困难决定，而是由概念性思维流畅性或其他一些认知过程的某些缺陷所致。
