Blaber M, Lindstrom J D, Gassner N, Xu J, Heinz D W, Matthews B W
Institute of Molecular Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Eugene, Oregon.
Biochemistry. 1993 Oct 26;32(42):11363-73. doi: 10.1021/bi00093a013.
In order to determine the thermodynamic cost of introducing a polar group within the core of a protein, a series of nine Ala-->Ser and 3 Val-->Thr substitutions was constructed in T4 lysozyme. The sites were all within alpha-helices but ranged from fully solvent-exposed to totally buried. The range of destabilization incurred by the Ala-->Ser substitutions was found to be very similar to that for the Val-->Thr replacements. For the solvent-exposed and partly exposed sites the destabilization was modest (approximately less than 0.5 kcal/mol). For the completely buried sites the destabilization was larger, but variable (approximately 1-3 kcal/mol). Crystal structure determinations showed that the Ala-->Ser mutant structures were, in general, very similar to their wild-type counterparts, even though the replacements introduce a hydroxyl group. This is in part because the introduced serines are all within alpha-helices and at congested sites can avoid steric clashes with surrounding atoms by making a hydrogen bond to a backbone carbonyl oxygen in the preceding turn of the helix. The three substituted threonine side chains essentially superimpose on their valine counterparts but display somewhat larger conformational adjustments. The results illustrate how a protein structure will adapt in different ways to avoid the presence of an unsatisfied hydrogen bond donor or acceptor. In the most extreme case, Val 149-->Thr, which is also the most destabilizing variant (delta delta G = 2.8 kcal/mol), a water molecule is incorporated in the mutant structure in order to provide a hydrogen-bonding partner. The results are consistent with the view that many hydrogen bonds within proteins contribute only marginally to stability but that noncharged polar groups that lack a hydrogen-bonding partner are very destabilizing (delta delta G approximately greater than 3 kcal/mol). Supportive of other studies, the alpha-helix propensity of alanine is seen to be higher than that of serine (delta delta G = 0.46 +/- 0.04 kcal/mol), while threonine and valine are similar in alpha-helix propensity.
为了确定在蛋白质核心区域引入极性基团的热力学代价,在T4溶菌酶中构建了一系列九个丙氨酸→丝氨酸和三个缬氨酸→苏氨酸的替换。这些位点均位于α-螺旋内,但从完全暴露于溶剂到完全埋藏不等。发现丙氨酸→丝氨酸替换引起的去稳定化范围与缬氨酸→苏氨酸替换的范围非常相似。对于暴露于溶剂和部分暴露的位点,去稳定化程度适中(约小于0.5千卡/摩尔)。对于完全埋藏的位点,去稳定化程度更大,但存在变化(约1 - 3千卡/摩尔)。晶体结构测定表明,尽管这些替换引入了一个羟基,但丙氨酸→丝氨酸突变体结构总体上与它们的野生型对应物非常相似。部分原因是引入的丝氨酸都在α-螺旋内,并且在拥挤的位点可以通过与螺旋前一圈的主链羰基氧形成氢键来避免与周围原子的空间冲突。三个被替换的苏氨酸侧链基本上与其缬氨酸对应物重叠,但显示出稍大的构象调整。结果说明了蛋白质结构将如何以不同方式进行适应,以避免出现未满足的氢键供体或受体。在最极端的情况,缬氨酸149→苏氨酸,这也是最不稳定的变体(ΔΔG = 2.8千卡/摩尔),一个水分子被纳入突变体结构中以提供氢键伙伴。这些结果与以下观点一致,即蛋白质内的许多氢键对稳定性的贡献仅微乎其微,但缺乏氢键伙伴的不带电荷的极性基团非常不稳定(ΔΔG约大于3千卡/摩尔)。支持其他研究的是,丙氨酸的α-螺旋倾向高于丝氨酸(ΔΔG = 0.46±0.04千卡/摩尔),而苏氨酸和缬氨酸在α-螺旋倾向上相似。