Xu J, Baase W A, Baldwin E, Matthews B W
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403, USA.
Protein Sci. 1998 Jan;7(1):158-77. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560070117.
To further examine the structural and thermodynamic basis of hydrophobic stabilization in proteins, all of the bulky non-polar residues that are buried or largely buried within the core of T4 lysozyme were substituted with alanine. In 25 cases, including eight reported previously, it was possible to determine the crystal structures of the variants. The structures of four variants with double substitutions were also determined. In the majority of cases the "large-to-small" substitutions lead to internal cavities. In other cases declivities or channels open to the surface were formed. In some cases the structural changes were minimal (mainchain shifts < or = 0.3 A); in other cases mainchain atoms moved up to 2 A. In the case of Ile 29 --> Ala the structure collapsed to such a degree that the volume of the putative cavity was zero. Crystallographic analysis suggests that the occupancy of the engineered cavities by solvent is usually low. The mutants Val 149 --> Ala (V149A) and Met 6 --> Ala (M6A), however, are exceptions and have, respectively, one and two well-ordered water molecules within the cavity. The Val 149 --> Ala substitution allows the solvent molecule to hydrogen bond to polar atoms that are occluded in the wild-type molecule. Similarly, the replacement of Met 6 with alanine allows the two solvent molecules to hydrogen bond to each other and to polar atoms on the protein. Except for Val 149 --> Ala the loss of stability of all the cavity mutants can be rationalized as a combination of two terms. The first is a constant for a given class of substitution (e.g., -2.1 kcal/mol for all Leu --> Ala substitutions) and can be considered as the difference between the free energy of transfer of leucine and alanine from solvent to the core of the protein. The second term can be considered as the energy cost of forming the cavity and is consistent with a numerical value of 22 cal mol(-1) A(-3). Physically, this term is due to the loss of van der Waal's interactions between the bulky sidechain that is removed and the atoms that form the wall of the cavity. The overall results are consistent with the prior rationalization of Leu --> Ala mutants in T4 lysozyme by Eriksson et al. (Eriksson et al., 1992, Science 255:178-183).
为了进一步研究蛋白质中疏水稳定作用的结构和热力学基础,将所有埋藏于或大部分埋藏于T4溶菌酶核心区域的大体积非极性残基替换为丙氨酸。在25个案例中,包括之前报道的8个案例,能够确定这些变体的晶体结构。还确定了4个具有双重替换的变体的结构。在大多数情况下,“大到小”的替换会导致内部空洞。在其他情况下,会形成向表面开放的凹陷或通道。在某些情况下,结构变化极小(主链位移≤0.3 Å);在其他情况下,主链原子移动可达2 Å。在Ile 29→Ala的情况下,结构坍塌到如此程度,以至于假定空洞的体积为零。晶体学分析表明,溶剂对工程化空洞的占有率通常较低。然而,突变体Val 149→Ala(V149A)和Met 6→Ala(M6A)是例外,在空洞内分别有一个和两个有序排列的水分子。Val 149→Ala替换使溶剂分子能够与野生型分子中被封闭的极性原子形成氢键。同样,用丙氨酸替换Met 6使两个溶剂分子能够相互形成氢键,并与蛋白质上的极性原子形成氢键。除了Val 149→Ala外,所有空洞突变体稳定性的丧失都可以合理地解释为两个因素的组合。第一个因素是给定替换类型的常数(例如,所有Leu→Ala替换为-2.1 kcal/mol),可以认为是亮氨酸和丙氨酸从溶剂转移到蛋白质核心的自由能之差。第二个因素可以认为是形成空洞的能量成本,与数值22 cal mol⁻¹ Å⁻³一致。从物理角度来看,这个因素是由于被去除的大体积侧链与形成空洞壁的原子之间范德华相互作用的丧失。总体结果与Eriksson等人(Eriksson等人,1992年,《科学》255:178 - 183)之前对T4溶菌酶中Leu→Ala突变体的合理解释一致。