• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盐水雾化吸入在支气管激发试验中不起作用。

The lack of a role for saline solution inhalation in bronchoprovocation challenge.

作者信息

Bartter T C, Dubois J, Pratter M R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Camden, NJ.

出版信息

Chest. 1993 Nov;104(5):1338-41. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.5.1338.

DOI:10.1378/chest.104.5.1338
PMID:8222784
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to look prospectively at the practice of prefacing methacholine bronchoprovocation challenge (BPC) with diluent challenge using physiologic saline solution (NaCl) as the diluent. We wished to determine whether NaCl challenge added to the safety or diagnostic accuracy of BPC. We studied 108 consecutive patients undergoing methacholine BPC. We determined (1) the FEV1 response of all patients to the inhalation of NaCl (the difference between the FEV1 before NaCl and the FEV1 after NaCl), and (2) the correlation between the response to saline solution and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) measured using methacholine. Paired Student's t testing demonstrated a small but significant difference between the values for FEV1 before and after NaCl for the group as a whole (n = 108; mean change, -0.9 +/- 4 percent [+/- SD]; p = 0.023). When the mean changes in the FEV1 after NaCl for the group with increased BHR (BHR+) (n = 62; mean, -1.1 +/- 4.9 percent) and the group with no increase in BHR (BHR-) (n = 46; mean, -0.6 +/- 2.4 percent) were contrasted, there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.46). Only 4 of 108 patients had a drop in FEV1 of 10 percent or more after NaCl, with the greatest drop being 16 percent. All four patients were BHR+, but none had marked BHR. For the BHR+ group, there was no correlation between response to saline solution and subsequent response to methacholine (r = 0.02). We conclude that saline solution challenge adds time and expense to BPC without increasing the safety or yield of BPC. We suggest that NaCl challenge can be omitted from the standard performance of BPC.

摘要

本研究的目的是前瞻性观察以生理盐水(NaCl)作为稀释剂进行稀释剂激发试验作为乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验(BPC)的前置操作。我们希望确定NaCl激发试验是否能提高BPC的安全性或诊断准确性。我们研究了108例连续接受乙酰甲胆碱BPC的患者。我们测定了(1)所有患者吸入NaCl后的第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)反应(NaCl吸入前的FEV1与NaCl吸入后的FEV1之差),以及(2)使用乙酰甲胆碱测定的对盐溶液的反应与支气管高反应性(BHR)之间的相关性。配对学生t检验显示,整个组(n = 108;平均变化,-0.9±4%[±标准差];p = 0.023)在NaCl吸入前后的FEV1值之间存在微小但显著的差异。当比较BHR增加组(BHR+)(n = 62;平均,-1.1±4.9%)和BHR未增加组(BHR-)(n = 46;平均,-0.6±2.4%)吸入NaCl后FEV1的平均变化时,两组之间无显著差异(p = 0.46)。108例患者中只有4例在吸入NaCl后FEV1下降10%或更多,最大下降为16%。所有4例患者均为BHR+,但均无明显BHR。对于BHR+组,对盐溶液的反应与随后对乙酰甲胆碱的反应之间无相关性(r = 0.02)。我们得出结论,盐溶液激发试验增加了BPC的时间和费用,而没有提高BPC的安全性或阳性率。我们建议在BPC的标准操作中可以省略NaCl激发试验。

相似文献

1
The lack of a role for saline solution inhalation in bronchoprovocation challenge.盐水雾化吸入在支气管激发试验中不起作用。
Chest. 1993 Nov;104(5):1338-41. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.5.1338.
2
Bronchodilator reversal of bronchospasm and symptoms incurred during methacholine bronchoprovocation challenge. Documentation of safety and time course.支气管扩张剂对乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验期间发生的支气管痉挛和症状的逆转作用。安全性和时间过程的记录。
Chest. 1993 Nov;104(5):1342-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.5.1342.
3
The use of mouth occlusion pressure to evaluate the effect of an initial inhalation of nebulized saline in methacholine challenge.使用口腔闭合压评估雾化盐水初次吸入在乙酰甲胆碱激发试验中的效果。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1996 May-Jun;24(3):125-8.
4
Sensitivity and specificity of bronchial provocation testing. An evaluation of four techniques in exercise-induced bronchospasm.支气管激发试验的敏感性和特异性。运动诱发性支气管痉挛中四种技术的评估。
Chest. 1992 Aug;102(2):347-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.102.2.347.
5
Repeatability of histamine bronchial challenge and comparability with methacholine bronchial challenge in a population of Australian schoolchildren.澳大利亚学龄儿童群体中组胺支气管激发试验的可重复性及其与乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验的可比性。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Aug;144(2):338-43. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.2.338.
6
Airway responses to a diluent used in the methacholine challenge test.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Mar;86(3):277-82. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63298-X.
7
Inhalational challenge using hypertonic saline in asthmatic subjects: a comparison with responses to hyperpnoea, methacholine and water.哮喘患者使用高渗盐水进行吸入激发试验:与对深呼吸、乙酰甲胆碱和水的反应比较
Eur Respir J. 1990 Feb;3(2):144-51.
8
Comparison of percentage fall in FVC at the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) between patients with asymptomatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness and mild asthma.无症状支气管高反应性患者与轻度哮喘患者在引起第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)下降20%的乙酰甲胆碱激发浓度下,用力肺活量(FVC)下降百分比的比较。
Chest. 2007 Jul;132(1):106-11. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2943. Epub 2007 May 15.
9
[Comparison of sensitivity and specifity of two bronchial provocation tests with methacholine and hypertonic saline in bronchial hyperreactivity evaluation in asthmatics].[两种支气管激发试验(使用乙酰甲胆碱和高渗盐水)在哮喘患者支气管高反应性评估中的敏感性和特异性比较]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 Feb;22(128):126-9.
10
The determinants of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis.过敏性鼻炎患者支气管高反应性的决定因素。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004 Aug;93(2):193-9. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61475-5.