• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Manometric studies of the esophagus in healthy subjects of different age groups].

作者信息

Micklefield G H, May B

机构信息

Abteilung für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1993 Oct 29;118(43):1549-54. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1059483.

DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1059483
PMID:8223203
Abstract

Oesophageal manometry was performed under standardized conditions in 100 healthy persons of different ages (54 males, 46 females; mean age 43.1 [18-84] years). They were grouped by age in decades (< or = 29 years: n = 23; 30-39 years: n = 18; 40-49 years: n = 19; 50-59 years; n = 20; and > or = 60 years: n = 20). The mean resting pressures at the lower oesophageal sphincter ranged among the different age groups from 18-22 mm Hg (total group 19 +/- 7 mm Hg), the mean contraction force at the distal tubular oesophagus ranged from 77-100 mm Hg (84 +/- 35 mm Hg), in the proximal tubular oesophagus from 53-58 mm Hg (56 +/- 22 mm Hg), and the resting pressures at the upper oesophageal sphincter from 34-45 mm Hg (37 +/- 17 mm Hg). There was no statistically significant difference between the various age groups for any of the motility parameters. It is concluded that age does not influence the findings in comparative studies of healthy persons and patients of differing ages.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Manometric studies of the esophagus in healthy subjects of different age groups].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1993 Oct 29;118(43):1549-54. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1059483.
2
Deterioration of esophageal motility with age: a manometric study of 79 healthy subjects.食管动力随年龄增长而恶化:对79名健康受试者的测压研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jul;94(7):1795-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01208.x.
3
Normal oesophageal manometric values in healthy adult volunteers.健康成年志愿者的正常食管测压值。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2003 Sep;53(9):401-5.
4
Manometric evaluation of achalasia in the elderly.老年人贲门失弛缓症的测压评估
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Feb 15;21(4):431-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02337.x.
5
Study of esophageal function by standard esophageal manometry in 72 healthy volunteers. Proposal for national reference values. Spanish Group for the Study of Digestive Motility.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1998 Sep;90(9):613-24.
6
The influence of ageing on oesophageal motility after ingestion of liquids with different viscosities.摄入不同粘度液体后衰老对食管动力的影响。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996 Aug;8(8):793-8.
7
[Esophageal manometric studies in patients with an apoplectic stroke with/without oropharyngeal dysphagia].[伴有/不伴有口咽吞咽困难的中风患者的食管测压研究]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1999 Mar 5;124(9):239-44. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024278.
8
Esophageal manometry: a comparison of findings in younger and older patients.食管测压:年轻患者与老年患者检查结果的比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 May;93(5):706-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.210_a.x.
9
[Normal values for 24-hour manometry of the esophagus].[食管24小时测压的正常值]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1997 Sep 5;122(36):1065-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1047729.
10
An analysis of distal esophageal impedance in individuals with and without esophageal motility abnormalities.对有和没有食管动力异常的个体的食管远端阻抗进行分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug;42(7):776-81. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31806daf77.

引用本文的文献

1
Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation is impaired in older patients with dysphagia.老年吞咽困难患者食管下括约肌松弛功能受损。
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Mar 14;17(10):1326-31. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i10.1326.
2
Gastro-Oesophageal reflux in the elderly: role of drug therapy in management.
Drugs Aging. 2001;18(6):409-14. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200118060-00003.
3
[Motility disorders of the esophagus in patients with apoplectic infarct during the acute illness phase].[急性病期脑梗死患者的食管运动障碍]
Med Klin (Munich). 1999 May 15;94(5):245-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03045048.