• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓刺激对严重心绞痛患者左心室功能影响的评估:一项超声心动图研究。

Assessment of the influence of spinal cord stimulation on left ventricular function in patients with severe angina pectoris: an echocardiographic study.

作者信息

Kujacic V, Eliasson T, Mannheimer C, Jablonskiene D, Augustinsson L E, Emanuelsson H

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Göteburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1993 Sep;14(9):1238-44. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/14.9.1238.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/14.9.1238
PMID:8223739
Abstract

Patients with severe, widespread coronary atherosclerosis and patients who have undergone several coronary artery bypass operations are often poor candidates for coronary bypass surgery (CABG). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to have an anti-anginal effect that is probably associated with an anti-ischaemic effect. In the present investigation, 15 patients with severe angina (mean age 64 years, range 49-71) were studied. All patients had a history of intractable angina pectoris despite optimal medical treatment and previous coronary bypass operation. The patients had multi-vessel disease and graft occlusion or graft stenosis on postoperative coronary angiograms. Left ventricular function was assessed echocardiographically at rest and during provocation with adenosine infusion in a control session without treatment and during treatment with SCS. The recovery time was at least 3 h. The decrease in the ejection fraction during adenosine infusion was more pronounced in the control situation (44 to 37%; P < 0.05) than during SCS (48 to 44%; ns), and the time to echocardiographic signs of dysfunction and to anginal pain during adenosine infusion was significantly prolonged during SCS (P < 0.001). In addition, the recovery time for these parameters was shorter during SCS (P < 0.001). It is concluded that the deterioration in left ventricular function during adenosine provocation was less pronounced with SCS than without. This possible anti-ischaemic effect is in agreement with results from earlier studies.

摘要

患有严重、广泛冠状动脉粥样硬化的患者以及接受过多次冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者通常不太适合进行冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)。脊髓刺激(SCS)已被证明具有抗心绞痛作用,这可能与抗缺血作用有关。在本研究中,对15例严重心绞痛患者(平均年龄64岁,范围49 - 71岁)进行了研究。所有患者尽管接受了最佳药物治疗且之前进行过冠状动脉搭桥手术,但仍有顽固性心绞痛病史。患者有多支血管病变,术后冠状动脉造影显示有移植血管闭塞或移植血管狭窄。在未治疗的对照阶段以及SCS治疗期间,通过超声心动图评估静息和腺苷输注激发时的左心室功能。恢复时间至少为3小时。腺苷输注期间射血分数的下降在对照情况下(从44%降至37%;P < 0.05)比SCS治疗期间(从48%降至44%;无显著性差异)更明显,并且腺苷输注期间出现功能障碍超声心动图征象和心绞痛的时间在SCS治疗期间显著延长(P < 0.001)。此外,SCS治疗期间这些参数的恢复时间更短(P < 0.001)。结论是,与未使用SCS相比,腺苷激发期间SCS治疗时左心室功能的恶化不那么明显。这种可能的抗缺血作用与早期研究结果一致。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the influence of spinal cord stimulation on left ventricular function in patients with severe angina pectoris: an echocardiographic study.脊髓刺激对严重心绞痛患者左心室功能影响的评估:一项超声心动图研究。
Eur Heart J. 1993 Sep;14(9):1238-44. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/14.9.1238.
2
Effects of spinal cord stimulation in angina pectoris induced by pacing and possible mechanisms of action.脊髓刺激对起搏诱发的心绞痛的影响及其可能的作用机制。
BMJ. 1993 Aug 21;307(6902):477-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6902.477.
3
Temporary cessation of spinal cord stimulation in angina pectoris-effects on symptoms and evaluation of long-term effect determinants.脊髓刺激暂时中断对心绞痛症状的影响及长期影响决定因素的评估
Coron Artery Dis. 2003 Jun;14(4):323-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mca.0000073433.02845.33.
4
Effects of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial ischaemia during daily life in patients with severe coronary artery disease. A prospective ambulatory electrocardiographic study.脊髓刺激对严重冠状动脉疾病患者日常生活中心肌缺血的影响。一项前瞻性动态心电图研究。
Br Heart J. 1994 May;71(5):413-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.71.5.413.
5
Sequelae of spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris. Reliability and safety profile of long-term clinical application.脊髓刺激治疗顽固性心绞痛的后遗症。长期临床应用的可靠性和安全性概况。
Coron Artery Dis. 1997 Jan;8(1):33-8. doi: 10.1097/00019501-199701000-00005.
6
Complications in spinal cord stimulation for treatment of angina pectoris. Differences in unipolar and multipolar percutaneous inserted electrodes.脊髓刺激治疗心绞痛的并发症。单极和多极经皮插入电极的差异。
Acta Cardiol. 1997;52(4):325-33.
7
Effect of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with refractory angina pectoris.脊髓刺激对难治性心绞痛患者心肌灌注储备的影响。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Apr;16(4):449-55. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu276. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
8
Electrical stimulation versus coronary artery bypass surgery in severe angina pectoris: the ESBY study.严重心绞痛患者的电刺激与冠状动脉搭桥手术对比研究:ESBY研究
Circulation. 1998 Mar 31;97(12):1157-63. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.12.1157.
9
Effect of spinal cord stimulation on regional myocardial perfusion assessed by positron emission tomography.脊髓刺激对通过正电子发射断层扫描评估的局部心肌灌注的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 1992 May 1;69(14):1143-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90926-p.
10
Effects of acute coronary occlusion and previous ischaemic injury on left ventricular wall motion in humans.急性冠状动脉闭塞和既往缺血性损伤对人体左心室壁运动的影响。
Heart. 1997 Apr;77(4):338-45. doi: 10.1136/hrt.77.4.338.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuromodulation devices for heart failure.用于心力衰竭的神经调节设备
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022 Aug 17;24(Suppl E):E12-E27. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac036. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable angina pectoris: a unified theory on its mechanism.脊髓刺激治疗慢性顽固性心绞痛:关于其机制的统一理论
Clin Cardiol. 2001 Aug;24(8):533-41. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960240803.
3
Neurostimulation treatment for angina pectoris.心绞痛的神经刺激治疗
Heart. 2000 Feb;83(2):217-20. doi: 10.1136/heart.83.2.217.
4
Spinal cord stimulation significantly decreases the need for acute hospital admission for chest pain in patients with refractory angina pectoris.脊髓刺激显著降低了难治性心绞痛患者因胸痛而需急性住院的必要性。
Heart. 1999 Jul;82(1):89-92. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.1.89.
5
The successful use of spinal cord stimulation to alleviate intractable angina pectoris.成功运用脊髓刺激来缓解顽固性心绞痛。
Ulster Med J. 1998 May;67(1):59-60.