Suppr超能文献

年龄和性别会影响机械通气的结果吗?

Do age and gender influence outcome from mechanical ventilation?

作者信息

Kollef M H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 1993 Sep-Oct;22(5):442-9.

PMID:8226009
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To define the role of age and gender on outcome from mechanical ventilation.

DESIGN

Prospective analysis of consecutive patients.

SETTING

A military-referral medical center.

PATIENTS

A total of 240 consecutive patients requiring 246 episodes of mechanical ventilation.

MEASUREMENTS

Demographic, clinical, and outcome data.

RESULTS

Univariate statistical techniques comparing 13 variables between survivors and nonsurvivors of an episode of mechanical ventilation indicated that the following eight variables were significantly different (p < 0.05) between these two groups: age, length of intensive care unit stay, duration of MV, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, Age Removed APACHE II score, Organ System Failure Index (OSFI), patient diagnostic category, and presence of malignancy. Patient sex demonstrated a trend towards significance (p = 0.051). These nine variables were entered into a stepwise logistic regression analysis to develop a model to predict outcome from mechanical ventilation. This model showed that only the OSFI (p < 0.001) and the APACHE II score (p = 0.0281) independently predicted outcome from mechanical ventilation. Similar analyses were performed to identify outcome predictors after segregating the patients according to age (less than 70 years and equal to or greater than 70 years) and according to sex. In the first of these subsequent analyses the OSFI was found to be the sole independent predictor of outcome for both older and younger subgroups. In the second analysis the OSFI, length of hospital stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation predicted outcome for male patients while the OSFI alone independently predicted outcome for female patients. Fifty-two survivors of mechanical ventilation over the age of 70 years were observed after hospital discharge (average follow-up time 2.75 +/- 1.36 months) to assess their need for institutional care after hospital discharge. Five of these patients (9.6%) required long-term care in a nursing home or rehabilitation hospital until their deaths (four patients) or discharge to home (one patient). With a stepwise logistic regression analysis, only the intensive care unit length of stay was found to be significant independent predictor for this outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the occurrence of derangements in organ function as described by the OSFI best predicts outcome from mechanical ventilation. Age and sex do not significantly contribute to patient outcome independent of organ system dysfunction.

摘要

目的

确定年龄和性别对机械通气预后的影响。

设计

对连续患者进行前瞻性分析。

地点

一家军事转诊医疗中心。

患者

共240例连续患者,需要进行246次机械通气。

测量指标

人口统计学、临床和预后数据。

结果

对机械通气一次的幸存者和非幸存者之间的13个变量进行单变量统计分析,结果显示,以下8个变量在两组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05):年龄、重症监护病房住院时间、机械通气持续时间、急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分、去除年龄后的APACHE II评分、器官系统衰竭指数(OSFI)、患者诊断类别和是否存在恶性肿瘤。患者性别显示出显著趋势(p = 0.051)。将这9个变量纳入逐步逻辑回归分析,以建立一个预测机械通气预后的模型。该模型显示,只有OSFI(p < 0.001)和APACHE II评分(p = 0.0281)能独立预测机械通气的预后。根据年龄(小于70岁和等于或大于70岁)和性别对患者进行分组后,进行了类似分析以确定预后预测因素。在这些后续分析的第一次中,发现OSFI是老年和年轻亚组预后的唯一独立预测因素。在第二次分析中,OSFI、住院时间和机械通气持续时间可预测男性患者的预后,而OSFI单独可独立预测女性患者的预后。观察了52例70岁以上机械通气幸存者出院后的情况(平均随访时间2.75 ± 1.36个月),以评估他们出院后对机构护理的需求。其中5例患者(9.6%)需要在养老院或康复医院接受长期护理,直至死亡(4例患者)或出院回家(1例患者)。通过逐步逻辑回归分析,发现只有重症监护病房住院时间是该结果的显著独立预测因素。

结论

这些结果表明,OSFI所描述的器官功能紊乱的发生最能预测机械通气的预后。年龄和性别在不依赖器官系统功能障碍的情况下,对患者预后没有显著影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验