Au W C, Su Y, Raj N B, Pitha P M
Oncology Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21231.
J Biol Chem. 1993 Nov 15;268(32):24032-40.
Transcriptional activation of interferon A (IFNA) gene in virus-infected cells is controlled by a 35-nucleotide inducible element that is cell type specific. Within this region, two elements, alpha F1 and IRF-1 binding sites, were shown by mutation analysis to play a crucial role in the expression of inducible element. In this study, we have analyzed the binding of nuclear proteins to the alpha F1 sequence and have shown that the induction is associated with the formation of a novel complex alpha F1/B, which contains at least two DNA binding proteins of 68 and 96 kDa. In contrast, no binding of the purified interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) either to the alpha F1 or IRF-1 binding sites could be detected in vitro. However, the oligonucleotides corresponding to alpha F1 or IRF-1 binding sites competed efficiently for the induction of IFNA4 promoter region in a transient transfection assay. We suggest that the induction of IFNA promoter region requires cooperation between alpha F1 binding proteins and IRF-1. Interestingly, our data also show that the inability of IFNA6 promoter to be expressed in infected L-cells may be a result of a viral-induced repressor, which could act by binding and inactivating alpha F1 or by competing for the IRF-1 binding site. These results suggest that cell-specific expression of IFNA genes results from core-cruitment of trans-acting factors that bind to alpha F1 and the IRF-1 binding site with the cell-specific virus-induced activator or repressor.
病毒感染细胞中干扰素A(IFNA)基因的转录激活受一个35个核苷酸的可诱导元件控制,该元件具有细胞类型特异性。在这个区域内,通过突变分析表明,两个元件,即αF1和IRF-1结合位点,在可诱导元件的表达中起关键作用。在本研究中,我们分析了核蛋白与αF1序列的结合,结果表明诱导与一种新型复合物αF1/B的形成有关,该复合物至少包含两种分子量分别为68 kDa和96 kDa的DNA结合蛋白。相比之下,在体外未检测到纯化的干扰素调节因子1(IRF-1)与αF1或IRF-1结合位点的结合。然而,在瞬时转染实验中,与αF1或IRF-1结合位点对应的寡核苷酸能有效竞争IFNA4启动子区域的诱导。我们认为IFNA启动子区域的诱导需要αF1结合蛋白和IRF-1之间的协同作用。有趣的是,我们的数据还表明,IFNA6启动子在感染的L细胞中无法表达可能是病毒诱导的阻遏物的结果,该阻遏物可能通过结合并使αF1失活或竞争IRF-1结合位点来发挥作用。这些结果表明,IFNA基因的细胞特异性表达是由与αF1和IRF-1结合位点结合的反式作用因子与细胞特异性病毒诱导的激活剂或阻遏物共同募集所致。