Cleophas T J
Department of Medicine, Merwede Hospital Sliedrecht-Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 Sep;33(9):799-804. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1993.tb01954.x.
If the effect of a treatment continues after the treatment is withdrawn then the response to a second treatment may well be due in part to the previous treatment. This, so called, carryover effect may bias any type of study in which subjects are tested more than once. Crossover studies can be routinely checked for this bias. In other study designs, however, common sense and alertness for unusual patterns in the data are the only defenses against it. The amount of carryover bias can be somewhat minimized by the following measures. Dose-response studies, dose-titration studies, and open-evaluation studies should require a sufficient washout period between the administrations of drugs. The use of duplicate standard deviations for the estimation of intraindividual reproducibility of a test should always be combined with a statistical test for differences between the duplicate data. Subjective variables, which are frequently influenced by psychologic carryover effects, should be validated together with objective variables whenever possible. In spite of these measures, many cases of carryover effect remain unpreventable. We shall simply have to accept them.
如果在停止治疗后治疗效果仍持续存在,那么对第二种治疗的反应很可能部分归因于先前的治疗。这种所谓的残留效应可能会使任何对受试者进行多次测试的研究产生偏差。交叉研究可以常规检查这种偏差。然而,在其他研究设计中,常识以及对数据中异常模式的警觉是防止这种偏差的唯一防线。通过以下措施可以在一定程度上减少残留偏差的量。剂量反应研究、剂量滴定研究和开放评估研究应在药物给药之间留出足够的洗脱期。在使用重复标准差来估计测试的个体内再现性时,应始终结合对重复数据之间差异的统计检验。主观变量经常受到心理残留效应的影响,只要有可能,应与客观变量一起进行验证。尽管采取了这些措施,许多残留效应的情况仍然无法预防。我们只能接受它们。