Steptoe A, Fieldman G, Evans O, Perry L
Department of Psychology, St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London, UK.
J Hypertens. 1993 Jul;11(7):751-9. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199307000-00011.
To assess the effects of control over work pace on cardiovascular stress responses in healthy middle-aged men.
The study involved administration in the laboratory of visual matrix and mirror drawing tasks, the pace of tasks being either under the control of the subject (self-paced) or determined externally (externally paced). The work demands in the two conditions were equated.
Forty men aged 55-65 years were randomly assigned to self-paced or externally paced conditions. Blood pressure (recorded continuously using the Finapres), heart rate, cardiac baroreflex sensitivity, salivary cortisol, skin conductance and breathing pattern were monitored at rest, during task performance and at recovery following tasks.
Blood pressure and heart rate responses were significantly greater under the externally paced than self-paced conditions. The mean increase in blood pressure during the visual matrix task averaged 19.8/9.4 versus 34.1/15.5 mmHg for the self- and externally paced conditions, and 28.2/13.7 versus 41.8/19.5 mmHg in response to mirror drawing, respectively. Performance of the matrix task was less accurate under externally paced than self-paced conditions, but the two groups did not differ in mirror drawing. A reduction in baroreflex sensitivity and increases in cortisol, respiration rate, tidal volume and skin conductance responses were recorded during tasks, but these responses did not distinguish the two groups. Men were divided on the basis of reported job strain associated with their regular work, using the demand-control model. Blood pressure and heart rate responses were particularly pronounced among men reporting high job strain who were allocated to the externally paced condition.
Middle-aged men showed greater stress-related cardiovascular responses when they performed tasks at a pace that they could not control. This pattern may be relevant to the mechanisms through which job strain (high demands associated with low control) influences cardiovascular disease risk.
评估工作节奏控制对健康中年男性心血管应激反应的影响。
该研究在实验室中进行视觉矩阵和镜像绘画任务,任务节奏由受试者控制(自定节奏)或由外部确定(外部定节奏)。两种条件下的工作要求相等。
40名年龄在55 - 65岁的男性被随机分配到自定节奏或外部定节奏条件。在休息时、任务执行期间和任务后恢复阶段,监测血压(使用Finapres连续记录)、心率、心脏压力反射敏感性、唾液皮质醇、皮肤电导率和呼吸模式。
在外部定节奏条件下,血压和心率反应显著大于自定节奏条件。在视觉矩阵任务期间,自定节奏和外部定节奏条件下血压的平均升高分别为19.8/9.4与34.1/15.5 mmHg,在镜像绘画任务中分别为28.2/13.7与41.8/19.5 mmHg。在外部定节奏条件下,矩阵任务的表现不如自定节奏条件准确,但两组在镜像绘画方面没有差异。在任务期间记录到压力反射敏感性降低以及皮质醇、呼吸频率、潮气量和皮肤电导率反应增加,但这些反应并未区分两组。根据使用需求 - 控制模型报告的与日常工作相关的工作压力对男性进行分组。在被分配到外部定节奏条件且报告工作压力高的男性中,血压和心率反应尤为明显。
中年男性在以无法控制的节奏执行任务时,表现出与压力相关的更大心血管反应。这种模式可能与工作压力(高需求与低控制相关)影响心血管疾病风险的机制有关。