Jablecki C K, Andary M T, So Y T, Wilkins D E, Williams F H
Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego.
Muscle Nerve. 1993 Dec;16(12):1392-414. doi: 10.1002/mus.880161220.
The sensitivity and specificity of nerve conduction studies (NCS's) and electromyography (EMG) for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) were evaluated by a critical review of the literature. With a search of the medical literature in English through May 1991, 165 articles were identified and reviewed on the basis of six criteria of scientific methodology. The findings of 11 articles that met all six criteria and the results of 48 additional studies that met four or five criteria are presented. We concluded that median sensory and motor NCS's are valid and reproducible clinical laboratory studies that confirm a clinical diagnosis of CTS with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. Clinical practice recommendations are made based on a comparison of the sensitivities of the several different median nerve conduction study (NCS) techniques.
通过对文献的严格综述,评估了神经传导研究(NCS)和肌电图(EMG)对腕管综合征(CTS)诊断的敏感性和特异性。通过检索截至1991年5月的英文医学文献,共识别出165篇文章,并根据六项科学方法标准进行了综述。呈现了符合所有六项标准的11篇文章的研究结果以及另外48项符合四项或五项标准的研究结果。我们得出结论,正中神经感觉和运动NCS是有效且可重复的临床实验室研究,能够以高度的敏感性和特异性证实CTS的临床诊断。基于对几种不同正中神经传导研究(NCS)技术敏感性的比较,提出了临床实践建议。