• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混淆“有罪”和“无罪”的概念:对涉嫌患有智力迟钝的犯罪者的影响。

Confusing the terms "guilty" and "not guilty": implications for alleged offenders with mental retardation.

作者信息

Smith S A

机构信息

Pee Dee Regional Center, Florence, SC 29502.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 1993 Oct;73(2):675-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.73.2.675.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.1993.73.2.675
PMID:8234620
Abstract

Evaluations of competency to stand trial of 45 alleged offenders with mental retardation were inspected to examine their understanding of "guilty" and "not guilty." Seven defendants (16%) had virtually no knowledge of "guilty" and were judged not competent after a thorough evaluation. None received a jail sentence. Although the criminal justice system served well this group with mental retardation, questions remain about the fate of those not identified. Are some pleading guilty when actually meaning "I did not do it" and being surprised by an unexpected jail sentence?

摘要

对45名被指控患有智力障碍的犯罪嫌疑人进行了受审能力评估,以检查他们对“有罪”和“无罪”的理解。7名被告(16%)对“有罪”几乎一无所知,在经过全面评估后被判定无受审能力。没有人被判处监禁。虽然刑事司法系统对这群智力障碍者运作良好,但对于那些未被识别者的命运仍存在疑问。是否有些人在实际意思是“我没做”时却认罪,并对意外的监禁判决感到惊讶?

相似文献

1
Confusing the terms "guilty" and "not guilty": implications for alleged offenders with mental retardation.混淆“有罪”和“无罪”的概念:对涉嫌患有智力迟钝的犯罪者的影响。
Psychol Rep. 1993 Oct;73(2):675-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.73.2.675.
2
A quick screening test of competency to stand trial for defendants with mental retardation.
Psychol Rep. 1995 Feb;76(1):91-7. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.1.91.
3
Defendants pleading insanity: an analysis of outcome.以精神错乱为由进行抗辩的被告:结果分析。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1989;17(2):203-11.
4
Comparison of two screening tests of competency to stand trial for defendants with mental retardation.
Psychol Rep. 1996 Feb;78(1):234. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.78.1.234.
5
Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.法医审前决策中的群体动态
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1997;25(1):95-104.
6
Can defendants with mental retardation successfully fake their performance on a test of competence to stand trial?
Behav Sci Law. 2007;25(4):545-60. doi: 10.1002/bsl.735.
7
The competency of criminal defendants to refuse, for delusional reasons, a viable insanity defense recommended by counsel.刑事被告出于妄想的原因拒绝律师建议的可行的精神错乱抗辩的能力。
Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(2):135-56. doi: 10.1002/bsl.527.
8
A psychometric study of stereotypes: assessment of malingering in a criminal forensic group.刻板印象的心理测量研究:刑事法医群体中诈病的评估
J Pers Assess. 1988 Fall;52(3):549-63. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5203_18.
9
An offer you cannot refuse: Plea offer size affects innocent but not guilty defendants' perceptions of voluntariness.一个无法拒绝的提议:辩诉交易的提议规模会影响无辜但非有罪被告对自愿性的看法。
Law Hum Behav. 2023 Dec;47(6):619-633. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000548.
10
[Competency of the mentally retarded to stand trial--relevance-analysis of intellectual faculties in the process space].[智障者受审的能力——过程空间中智力机能的相关性分析]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 1988;90(2):111-24.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of people with autism spectrum disorder and the criminal justice system.对自闭症谱系障碍患者与刑事司法系统的系统评价。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2014 Nov;44(11):2717-33. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2046-5.