• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cost containment in the use of low-osmolar contrast agents: effect of guidelines, monitoring, and feedback mechanisms.

作者信息

Levin D C, Gardiner G A, Karasick S, Shaber G S, Wechsler R J, McArdle G H, Lockard C D, Harford R J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

出版信息

Radiology. 1993 Dec;189(3):753-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.189.3.8234700.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.189.3.8234700
PMID:8234700
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe a program for controlling intravenous use of low-osmolar contrast agents (LOCAs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The department of radiology at the authors' institution adopted a policy of selective use of intravenously administered LOCAs. Clinical indications for LOCA use were specified after consultation with the administration, risk managers, legal department, and ethics committee of the hospital. The guidelines were then publicized throughout the department and hospital, and a contrast agent data form was developed to collect data on all cases. Monitoring mechanisms were instituted.

RESULTS

Over the next 23 months, 11,373 patients received intravenous iodinated contrast agents, of whom 28.1% were deemed to be at high risk and were given LOCAs. Monthly tracking showed no evidence of a trend toward increasing use of LOCAs.

CONCLUSION

Clear definition of use guidelines, close monitoring, and feedback can stabilize LOCA use at acceptably low levels.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cost containment in the use of low-osmolar contrast agents: effect of guidelines, monitoring, and feedback mechanisms.
Radiology. 1993 Dec;189(3):753-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.189.3.8234700.
2
Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost.静脉肾盂造影和CT中低渗性造影剂的选择性使用:安全性及对成本的影响
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Oct;163(4):965-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.4.8092044.
3
The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Oct;159(4):869-74. doi: 10.2214/ajr.159.4.1529856.
4
Indications for the use of low-osmolar contrast agents.低渗性造影剂的使用指征。
Physician Exec. 1989 Jul-Aug;15(4):24-5.
5
Hospitals begin cutting non-ionic contrast agent use.医院开始减少非离子型造影剂的使用。
Hosp Mater Manage. 1993 Oct;18(10):1, 11-2.
6
Adverse events with radiographic contrast agents: results of the SCVIR Contrast Agent Registry.放射造影剂的不良事件:SCVIR造影剂登记处的结果
Radiology. 1997 Jun;203(3):611-20. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169677.
7
Cost-effectiveness and safety of selective use of low-osmolality contrast media.
Acad Radiol. 1994 Sep;1(1):59-62. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(05)80787-1.
8
Use of imaging agents underscores extent of battle to control costs.成像剂的使用凸显了控制成本斗争的程度。
Mod Healthc. 1994 Mar 28;24(13):42.
9
[Cost analysis of contrast-enhanced cranial MRI at a German university hospital].[德国一家大学医院头颅对比增强磁共振成像的成本分析]
Rofo. 2010 Oct;182(10):891-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245511. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
10
Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1991 Dec;22(4):664-76.

引用本文的文献

1
Selective use of low-osmolality contrast media in computed tomography.计算机断层扫描中低渗性对比剂的选择性使用。
Eur Radiol. 2003 Aug;13(8):2000-5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-001-1190-4. Epub 2001 Dec 13.
2
Iomeprol: a review of its use as a contrast medium.碘海醇:作为造影剂的应用综述
Drugs. 2000 May;59(5):1169-86. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059050-00013.