Trachsel L
Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, California.
Sleep. 1993 Sep;16(6):586-94. doi: 10.1093/sleep/16.6.586.
Frequency specific power obtained from time and frequency domain analyses are explored in simulated signals and all-night electroencephalogram (EEG). Signals were subjected to a fast Hartley transformation (FHT) and to digital sixth-order Bessel bandpass filters (BDF) of the infinite impulse response type. Numeric values of FHT, BDF and, if suited, authentic frequency specific power were subjected to a Pearson correlation. Frequency bins at 1.6-2.4 Hz (delta), 4.75-5.9 Hz (theta), 9.3-11.5 Hz (alpha), 12.5-14.9 Hz (sigma) and 16.6-19.5 Hz (beta) were investigated. When compared with true power of single frequency oscillators (256-sample windows), frequency specific power of the FHT correlated functionally (1.0) and BDF correlated highly (0.85, delta; 0.99, other bins). For analyses of "white noise", a multiple frequency oscillator and all-night EEG, four rectangular window sizes were applied (256, 512, 1,024 or 2,048 samples). The FHT power correlated better with authentic frequency specific power of "white noise" (256-sample windows) (0.61-0.98) than BDF power (0.67-0.89). With 512-sample windows of "white noise", the estimate of both the FHT (0.69-0.99) and BDF (0.71-0.93) improved. Direct comparison between FHT and BDF frequency specific power obtained from "white noise" or all-night EEG revealed a high degree of compliance between methods for all frequency bins (up to 0.99). For delta, the accord was relatively low for the 256-sample window (EEG, 0.68; "white noise", 0.72), but increased with lengthening window size (2,048-sample: 0.97; 0.99). Averaging of multiple EEG 256-sample windows also increased the agreement between methods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在模拟信号和整夜脑电图(EEG)中,探讨了从时域和频域分析获得的频率特异性功率。信号经过快速哈特利变换(FHT)和无限脉冲响应类型的数字六阶贝塞尔带通滤波器(BDF)处理。对FHT、BDF的数值以及(若适用)真实的频率特异性功率进行皮尔逊相关性分析。研究了1.6 - 2.4赫兹(δ波)、4.75 - 5.9赫兹(θ波)、9.3 - 11.5赫兹(α波)、12.5 - 14.9赫兹(σ波)和16.6 - 19.5赫兹(β波)的频率区间。与单频振荡器的真实功率(256个样本窗口)相比,FHT的频率特异性功率在功能上具有相关性(1.0),BDF具有高度相关性(δ波为0.85;其他区间为0.99)。对于“白噪声”、多频振荡器和整夜EEG的分析,应用了四种矩形窗口大小(256、512、1024或2048个样本)。FHT功率与“白噪声”(256个样本窗口)的真实频率特异性功率的相关性(0.61 - 0.98)优于BDF功率(0.67 - 0.89)。对于“白噪声”的512个样本窗口,FHT(0.69 - 0.99)和BDF(0.71 - 0.93)的估计值均有所改善。从“白噪声”或整夜EEG获得的FHT和BDF频率特异性功率的直接比较显示,所有频率区间的方法之间具有高度一致性(高达0.99)。对于δ波,256个样本窗口的一致性相对较低(EEG为0.68;“白噪声”为0.72),但随着窗口大小的增加而提高(2048个样本:EEG为0.97;“白噪声”为0.99)。对多个EEG的256个样本窗口进行平均也增加了方法之间的一致性。(摘要截断于250字)