Cham C W, Haq S M, Rahamim J
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK.
Thorax. 1993 Sep;48(9):925-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.48.9.925.
Patients are often referred to thoracic units for management of empyema after the acute phase has been treated with antibiotics but without adequate drainage. This study evaluates the effects of delay in surgical treatment of empyema thoracis on morbidity and mortality.
Thirty nine consecutive patients were studied from January 1991 to June 1992. Two groups (group 1, 16 patients; group 2, 23 patients) were compared depending on the time spent under the care of other specialists before referral to the thoracic unit (group 1, seven days or less; group 2, eight days or more). The reasons for delay in referral were analysed.
Four patients were treated conservatively with chest drainage alone (all in group 1). Thirty five patients required rib resection and drainage of their empyema (group 1, 12 patients; group 2, 23 patients). Nineteen (all in group 2) of the 35 patients who had rib resections went on to have decortication. The commonest cause of empyema was post-pneumonic (37 out of 39 patients). Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest organism isolated. Misdiagnosis (five patients), inappropriate antibiotics (six patients), and inappropriate placement of chest drainage tubes (three patients) all contributed to persistence and eventual progression of empyema. The overall mortality was 10% and mortality increased with age. The median stay in hospital was 9.5 days (range 7-12 days, n = 4) for patients treated with closed tube drainage only; 18 days (range 10-33 days, n = 16) for patients who had undergone rib resections and open drainage; and 28 days (range 22-49 days, n = 19) for patients who underwent decortication. The likelihood of having a staged procedure (antibiotics, closed tube drainage, open drainage with rib resection, and finally decortication) increased when closed tube drainage was persevered with for more than seven days. The total hospital stay was positively related with the time before referral for surgical treatment. Anaemia, low albumin concentrations, and worsening liver function were found in group 2 compared with group 1.
Early adequate operative drainage in patients with empyema results in low morbidity, shorter stays in hospital, and good long term outcome. These patients should be treated aggressively and early referral for definitive surgical management is recommended.
在急性期使用抗生素治疗但引流不充分后,患者常被转诊至胸外科治疗脓胸。本研究评估脓胸手术治疗延迟对发病率和死亡率的影响。
对1991年1月至1992年6月期间连续收治的39例患者进行研究。根据转诊至胸外科之前在其他专科医生处接受治疗的时间将患者分为两组(第1组,16例患者;第2组,23例患者)(第1组,7天或更短;第2组,8天或更长)。分析了转诊延迟的原因。
4例患者仅接受胸腔闭式引流保守治疗(均在第1组)。35例患者需要行肋骨切除并引流脓胸(第1组,12例患者;第2组,23例患者)。35例行肋骨切除的患者中有19例(均在第2组)随后进行了纤维板剥脱术。脓胸最常见的病因是肺炎后(39例患者中的37例)。分离出的最常见病原体是金黄色葡萄球菌。误诊(5例患者)、不适当的抗生素使用(6例患者)和胸腔引流管放置不当(3例患者)均导致脓胸持续存在并最终进展。总体死亡率为10%,且死亡率随年龄增加。仅接受闭式引流治疗的患者住院中位时间为9.5天(范围7 - 12天,n = 4);接受肋骨切除并开放引流的患者为18天(范围10 - 33天,n = 16);接受纤维板剥脱术的患者为28天(范围22 - 49天,n = 19)。当胸腔闭式引流持续超过7天时,进行分期手术(抗生素、闭式引流、肋骨切除开放引流,最后纤维板剥脱术)的可能性增加。总住院时间与手术治疗转诊前的时间呈正相关。与第1组相比,第2组患者出现贫血、白蛋白浓度降低和肝功能恶化。
脓胸患者早期进行充分的手术引流可降低发病率、缩短住院时间并获得良好的长期预后。这些患者应积极治疗,建议尽早转诊进行确定性手术治疗。