Ceña Callejo R, Blanco Quirós A
INSERSO de Valladolid.
An Esp Pediatr. 1993 Aug;39(2):105-10.
Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) occurs with a high frequency, about 2 in every 1,000 live newborns, and could be prevented by home monitoring. However, identification of infants at high risk must first be made. In this paper, we report the epidemiological factors of 36 selected infants with a well known high risk of SIDS. Two different scorings for the evaluation of high risk SIDS were compared and used in these children. The Sheffield scoring showed high risk in 11 (30.5%) of the cases versus 7 (9.7%) in the normal control group (p = 0.013). By using the multistage scoring method, 27 (75.0%) of the cases had a high risk versus 8 (11.1%) in the controls (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, by the latter method, too many normal infants (41 = 56.9%) were predicted to have a moderate risk of SIDS. The multistage test seems more useful than the Sheffield test, but has the limitation of having to be evaluated at one month of age, whereas results of the Sheffield test are obtained at birth. The epidemiological circumstances could be different in every social level or geographical area, so the usefulness of each scoring procedure must be evaluated in the normal population previous to being used in study groups.
婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)的发生率很高,每1000例活产新生儿中约有2例,可通过家庭监测预防。然而,必须首先识别出高危婴儿。在本文中,我们报告了36例已知有SIDS高风险的选定婴儿的流行病学因素。比较并在这些儿童中使用了两种不同的评估SIDS高危的评分方法。谢菲尔德评分显示11例(30.5%)病例为高危,而正常对照组为7例(9.7%)(p = 0.013)。采用多阶段评分法,27例(75.0%)病例为高危,而对照组为8例(11.1%)(p < 0.001)。然而,采用后一种方法时,预计有太多正常婴儿(41例 = 56.9%)有中度SIDS风险。多阶段测试似乎比谢菲尔德测试更有用,但有必须在1月龄时进行评估的局限性,而谢菲尔德测试的结果在出生时获得。每个社会阶层或地理区域的流行病学情况可能不同,因此在用于研究组之前,必须在正常人群中评估每种评分程序的有用性。