Suppr超能文献

35例连续性高血压患者的“白大衣”效应。量化方法、医患对话的作用

["White-coat" effect in 35 consecutive patients with hypertension. Quantification method, role of physician-patient dialogue].

作者信息

Le Pailleur C, Feder J M, Baubion N, Landais P, el Hasnaoui A, Montgermont P, Metzger J P, Heulin A, Mounier-Vehier C, Vacheron A

机构信息

Clinique cardiologique, hôpital Necker, Paris.

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1993 Apr;86(4):427-33.

PMID:8239870
Abstract

The "white coat" effect, an alarm reaction to the presence of a doctor, is an important cause of blood pressure variability, the frequency, amplitude and mechanisms of which are only partially understood. In order to evaluate these factors, a prospective study was undertaken in 35 consecutive patients referred for assessment of clinical hypertension. The alarm reaction was investigated during the consultation, at the time of interrogation, in periods of silence, in the sitting and upright positions. Twenty-four to forty-eight measurements (average 36.8) of the blood pressure and heart rate were performed in each patient with a Diasys 200 R monitor. The ambulatory period of 3 to 5 hours after the consultation provided 12 to 24 measurements (average 20.7) which were considered to be the reference for comparison with the consultation period. A total of 2,038 measurement were made and analysed. Analysis of variance (GLM) for each patient and for the whole group gave an assessment of the alarm reaction during the patient-doctor dialogue and periods of silence with reference to the ambulatory period. During the ambulatory period, the average and standard deviation for systolic pressure were 134 +/- 0.7 mmHg, and for diastolic pressure 93.1 +/- 0.6 mmHg. These pressures were significantly lower than during the two periods of consultation, with and without dialogue (p < 0.0001). During the consultation, the systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were significantly higher during the dialogue than during the periods of silence (p < 0.0001). During the dialogue, the systolic pressure attained 153.7 +/- 0.7 mmHg and the diastolic pressure: 107.2 +/- 0.6 mmHg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

“白大褂”效应,即对医生在场产生的一种警觉反应,是血压变异性的一个重要原因,其发生频率、幅度及机制仅得到部分了解。为评估这些因素,对35例因临床高血压评估前来就诊的连续患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。在会诊期间、问诊时、安静时段、坐姿和站立姿势下对警觉反应进行了调查。使用Diasys 200 R监测仪对每位患者进行了24至48次(平均36.8次)血压和心率测量。会诊后3至5小时的动态监测期提供了12至24次(平均20.7次)测量数据,这些数据被视为与会诊期进行比较的参考值。共进行并分析了2038次测量。对每位患者及整个研究组进行方差分析(GLM),以参照动态监测期评估医患对话期间及安静时段的警觉反应。在动态监测期,收缩压的平均值和标准差分别为134±0.7 mmHg,舒张压为93.1±0.6 mmHg。这些血压值显著低于有对话和无对话的两个会诊期(p<0.0001)。在会诊期间,对话时的收缩压和舒张压值显著高于安静时段(p<0.0001)。对话期间,收缩压达到153.7±0.7 mmHg,舒张压达到107.2±0.6 mmHg。(摘要截选至250词)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验