Paul R, Lynn T F, Lohr-Flanders M
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, OR 97207.
J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Oct;36(5):1055-62. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3605.1055.
Late-talking and normally speaking toddlers with and without histories of middle ear involvement were followed for 2 years to assess speech and expressive language outcomes. Results revealed no differences in expressive language outcome that could be attributed to history of middle ear involvement in either group. There did seem to be differences in outcome on measures of articulation that were associated with history of middle ear involvement. The implications of these findings for treatment of otitis media and for referral of late-talking toddlers for speech and language services are discussed.
对有和没有中耳受累病史的学语迟缓幼儿以及正常学语幼儿进行了为期两年的跟踪，以评估言语和表达性语言的结果。结果显示，两组中可归因于中耳受累病史的表达性语言结果没有差异。在与中耳受累病史相关的发音测量结果上似乎确实存在差异。本文讨论了这些研究结果对中耳炎治疗以及学语迟缓幼儿转介接受言语和语言服务的意义。
