Eisenwort B, Willinger U, Völkl-Kernstock S, Hurch B
Klinische Abteilung für Phoniatrie-Logopädie, Universitäts-HNO-Klinik, Wien.
HNO. 1997 Aug;45(8):638-42. doi: 10.1007/s001060050139.
Diagnostics of developmental speech- and language disorders is based primarily on the criteria severity of involvement and pattern. Regarding phonological disorders single word articulation tests are widely used because of efficiency considerations. However they are insufficient for ICD-10 diagnostics, because severity of involvement and pattern are influenced from the fact that children are spontaneously talking or giving single word responses. "Percentage of Consonants Correct (PCC)" and "Percentage of Consonants Correct for early, middle and late consonants" are described as an articulation competence metric, whereas "Natural Process Analysis" is proposed to describe the pattern of the disorder. Three case studies are used to outline the methods. Data show that "Percentage of Consonants Correct" is a good metric to index severity of involvement and "Natural Process Analysis" is a prerequisite to describe the pattern of the disorder.
发育性言语和语言障碍的诊断主要基于受累程度的标准和模式。出于效率考虑，单字发音测试在语音障碍诊断中被广泛使用。然而，它们对于国际疾病分类第10版（ICD - 10）的诊断并不充分，因为受累程度和模式会受到儿童是自发交谈还是给出单字回答这一事实的影响。“正确辅音百分比（PCC）”和“早期、中期和晚期辅音的正确辅音百分比”被描述为一种发音能力指标，而“自然过程分析”则被提议用于描述障碍模式。三个案例研究用于概述这些方法。数据表明，“正确辅音百分比”是衡量受累程度的良好指标，而“自然过程分析”是描述障碍模式的先决条件。
