Hopper K D, Abendroth C S, Sturtz K W, Matthews Y L, Shirk S J, Stevens L A
Department of Radiology, Penn State University, Hershey 17033.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Dec;161(6):1299-301. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.6.8249746.
The purpose of this study was to compare several of the commonly used manual biopsy needles with several of the new automated biopsy devices (biopsy guns) for biopsy of medical renal disease.
Ten different biopsy needles or automated devices were each used to do two biopsies of 10 cadaveric kidneys. The specimens were reviewed in a blinded fashion by a pathologist using a previously published histopathologic scale.
Of the four conventional biopsy needles tested (16-gauge Jamshidi, 18-gauge Sure-Cut, 14-gauge Tru-Cut, and 14-gauge Vim Silverman), the Jamshidi needle obtained the greatest average number of glomeruli (5.64). Results similar to those obtained with the conventional needles were obtained with the 16- and 18-gauge Biopty and Ultra-Cut biopsy guns. The 18-gauge Autovac gun with either a 2- or 4-cm depth of biopsy suffered from a significant number of biopsies from which no tissue was obtained. The 14-gauge Biopty gun was clearly superior, leading in all graded categories including the average number of glomeruli (8.11) per biopsy.
The automated biopsy device, or biopsy gun, can provide more diagnostic specimens than can manual or conventional needles in biopsy for medical renal disease.
本研究旨在比较几种常用的手动活检针与几种新型自动活检设备(活检枪)在肾内科疾病活检中的应用。
使用10种不同的活检针或自动活检设备,分别对10个尸体肾脏进行两次活检。病理学家采用先前公布的组织病理学评分标准,以盲法对标本进行评估。
在测试的4种传统活检针(16号Jamshidi针、18号Sure-Cut针、14号Tru-Cut针和14号Vim Silverman针)中,Jamshidi针获得的肾小球平均数量最多(5.64个)。16号和18号Biopty和Ultra-Cut活检枪的结果与传统活检针相似。18号Autovac枪,无论活检深度为2厘米还是4厘米,均有大量活检未获取到组织。14号Biopty枪明显更优,在所有分级类别中均领先,包括每次活检的肾小球平均数量(8.11个)。
在肾内科疾病活检中,自动活检设备即活检枪比手动或传统活检针能提供更多的诊断标本。