Gottfried E L, Kamoun M, Burke M D
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1993 Dec;100(6):594-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/100.6.594.
The Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists conducted a survey of US medical schools to examine the current status of laboratory medicine education, estimate the amount of teaching time available in the curriculum, and identify the most effective teaching practices. Questionnaires were sent to department heads and course directors at 126 US medical schools. Replies were received from 120 schools (95%), 83 of which offered a total of 132 courses in laboratory medicine. Only 68 schools (57%) had required courses. Most of the elective courses (35 of 50; 70%) were in general clinical pathology. Lectures remained the most common teaching format, with or without laboratory sessions and workshops. Computer-assisted instruction was used in only 10 schools. Laboratory medicine courses were offered in all 4 years of medical school, with the majority (70 of 132; 53%) in the second year, often integrated with general pathology. Opinion was divided over the relative importance of laboratory medicine instruction in the preclinical versus clinical years.
临床检验医师与科学家学会对美国医学院校进行了一项调查,以考察检验医学教育的现状,估算课程中可用的教学时间,并确定最有效的教学方法。问卷被发送至美国126所医学院校的系主任和课程主任。收到了120所学校(95%)的回复,其中83所学校总共开设了132门检验医学课程。只有68所学校(57%)设有必修课。大多数选修课(50门中的35门;70%)是普通临床病理学课程。讲座仍然是最常见的教学形式,无论是否有实验课和研习班。只有10所学校使用了计算机辅助教学。检验医学课程在医学院校的四年中均有开设,其中大部分(132门中的70门;53%)在第二年,通常与普通病理学相结合。对于检验医学教学在临床前阶段与临床阶段的相对重要性,意见存在分歧。